2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4573.2002.tb00325.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Compositional Changes in Beefburgers on Their Temperatures and Their Thermal and Dielectric Properties During Microwave Heating

Abstract: This study focused on a microwavable bunburger consisting of a precooked burger in a bread bun. The objective was to assess whether burger formulation changes would affect selected thermal and dielectric properties of the precooked burgers in addition to affecting bunburger temperatures during microwaving. Control burgers and those with elevated fat, water, rusk and salt levels were prepared. Proximal analysis of the raw and precooked burgers revealed a reduction in the fat and moisture content differences fol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant difference was noted between raw leg and shoulder in any of the dielectric properties examined (P P 0.05). One possible explanation for this is that the proximate composition of leg and shoulder are not significantly different (Table 2) and composition has been previously shown to effect dielectric properties (Lyng, Scully, McKenna, Hunter, & Molloy, 2002;Zhang, Lyng, Brunton, Morgan et al, 2004). Dielectric properties measured following injection indicated overall that e 00 values at both frequencies were significantly higher (P < 0.05) and D p values significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the values prior to injection.…”
Section: Dielectric Properties Of Leg and Shoulder Hamsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…No significant difference was noted between raw leg and shoulder in any of the dielectric properties examined (P P 0.05). One possible explanation for this is that the proximate composition of leg and shoulder are not significantly different (Table 2) and composition has been previously shown to effect dielectric properties (Lyng, Scully, McKenna, Hunter, & Molloy, 2002;Zhang, Lyng, Brunton, Morgan et al, 2004). Dielectric properties measured following injection indicated overall that e 00 values at both frequencies were significantly higher (P < 0.05) and D p values significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the values prior to injection.…”
Section: Dielectric Properties Of Leg and Shoulder Hamsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…No significant difference was noted between raw leg and shoulder in any of the dielectric properties examined (P P 0.05). One possible explanation for this is that the proximate composition of leg and shoulder are not significantly different (Table 2) and composition has been previously shown to affect dielectric properties (Lyng, Scully, McKenna, Hunter, & Molloy, 2002;. Dielectric properties measured following injection indicated overall that e 00 values at both frequencies were significantly higher (P < 0.05) and D p values significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the values prior to injection.…”
Section: Dielectric Properties and Penetration Depths For Leg And Shomentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thermal conductivity measurements were carried out using a thermal conductivity probe constructed by Dr James Lyng of the Department of Food Science, UCD (Lyng et al, 2002). The probe was placed into a plastic cup containing approximately 50 mL of sample.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%