2016
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1223798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Community Disadvantage and Masculinity Ideology on Number of Sexual Partners: A Prospective Analysis of Young Adult, Rural Black Men

Abstract: Young, rural Black men are disproportionately affected by sexually transmitted infections, a consequence, in part, of multiple sexual partnerships. We conducted a prospective study that examined the influence of masculinity ideology on changes in numbers of sexual partners in this population. We focused on a set of high-risk attitudes termed “reputational masculinity.” Community disadvantage during young adulthood was examined as a risk factor for reputational masculinity ideology, and vocational commitment wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RDS protocols are designed to attenuate the influence of biases common in chain-referral samples and to improve the approximation of a random sample of the target population (31, 32). Analyses of network data related to substance use and other risky behavior at T1 (33, 34) indicated that the sample evinced negligible levels of common biases observed in chain-referral samples arising from the characteristics of the initial seed participants, the recruitment efficacy of individual participants, and differences in the sizes of participants’ networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The RDS protocols are designed to attenuate the influence of biases common in chain-referral samples and to improve the approximation of a random sample of the target population (31, 32). Analyses of network data related to substance use and other risky behavior at T1 (33, 34) indicated that the sample evinced negligible levels of common biases observed in chain-referral samples arising from the characteristics of the initial seed participants, the recruitment efficacy of individual participants, and differences in the sizes of participants’ networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The RDS protocols and weighting system are designed to attenuate the influence of biases common in chain-referral samples and to improve approximation of a random sample of the target population (Heckathorn, 1997, 2002). Analyses of network data related to substance use and other risky behavior at T1 (Kogan et al, 2016) indicated that the sample evinced negligible levels of common biases observed in chain-referral samples arising from the characteristics of the initial seed participants, the recruitment efficacy of individual participants, and differences in the sizes of participants’ networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RDS protocols and weighting system are designed to attenuate the influence of biases common in chain-referral samples and to improve approximation of a random sample of the target population (Heckathorn, 1997, 2002). Analyses of network data related to substance use and other risky behavior at T1 (Kogan et al, 2016) indicated that the sample evinced negligible levels of common biases observed in chain-referral samples arising from the characteristics of the initial seed participants, the recruitment efficacy of individual participants, and differences in the sizes of participants’ networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%