Abstract:Metabolic and thermal responses of infant caribou to climate were measured during the June calving period on the barrens in the area of Mosquito Lake and Beverly Lake, N.W.T. It was found that temperature regulation was well established at birth and that the calves were very sensitive metabolically to cold, wind, and precipitation. The metabolic rate was doubled by a lowering of temperature to about 0 °C, but cold combined with wind and precipitation elevated the metabolic rate to over five times the resting v… Show more
“…Wet Svalbard reindeer calf fur appears more resistant to heat loss than other reindeer calf fur, and Svalbard reindeer are sedentary in behaviour (Tyler, 1987). Barren-ground caribou calves may move long distances in adverse weather (Hart et al, 1961), which results in metabolic costs for both movement and thermoregulation given the maximized surface area to volume ratio. In contrast, Svalbard reindeer calves remain on the calving sites, and whenever necessary may utilize the lying position, which reduces the surface area to volume ratio and hence exposure to wind, rain or temperature.…”
Section: Simulated Heavy Rainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hart et al (1961), studying infant caribou calves (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus), observed that a combination of cold ambient temperatures, wind and wet fur increased the resting meta-7 Rain more important than windchill for insulation loss in Svalbard reindeer fur…”
Heat transfer through dry and wet Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) summer and winter midback fur samples was studied in a wind tunnel. A light wetting water spray simulated heavy fog, mist or light rain, while heavy soaking simulated heavy rain. Wind velocities ranged from 0 to 10 m . s -1 . Calf fur samples were from June, August and March. Adult fur samples were females from August and March. There was no evidence for increased heat loss from lightly wet fur relative to dry fur. Calm air conductance decreased for calf fur (P's < 0.05). Adult fur also decreased, however, the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Further, wind coefficients and regressions for lightly wet fur were similar or below those for dry fur. A thin water film forming on the fur surface may have caused this. It is unlikely that a light rain, fog or mist would cause increased heat loss for Svalbard reindeer, and no increase of metabolic heat production would be needed to maintain thermoregulation. Only the simulated heavy rain dramatically raised heat loss from the fur samples examined regardless of age or season, e.g., heavy soaking increased calm air conductance for all furs (P's < 0.05). This was likely due to the addition of evaporative heat loss from the fur surface and a reduction in the amount of trapped air within the fur. Windchill was of minor importance, since wind coefficients were generally close to zero, meaning increasing wind velocity only marginally raised heat loss even with the added effect of evaporative heat loss. Rain would cause greater insulation loss than increasing wind velocity in Svalbard reindeer of all ages, with the exception of calves under one month old, which could experience dramatic insulation loss from a combination of heavy rain and windchill. Dry or wet, Svalbard reindeer fur appears to provide better insulation than fur of others of their species.
“…Wet Svalbard reindeer calf fur appears more resistant to heat loss than other reindeer calf fur, and Svalbard reindeer are sedentary in behaviour (Tyler, 1987). Barren-ground caribou calves may move long distances in adverse weather (Hart et al, 1961), which results in metabolic costs for both movement and thermoregulation given the maximized surface area to volume ratio. In contrast, Svalbard reindeer calves remain on the calving sites, and whenever necessary may utilize the lying position, which reduces the surface area to volume ratio and hence exposure to wind, rain or temperature.…”
Section: Simulated Heavy Rainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hart et al (1961), studying infant caribou calves (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus), observed that a combination of cold ambient temperatures, wind and wet fur increased the resting meta-7 Rain more important than windchill for insulation loss in Svalbard reindeer fur…”
Heat transfer through dry and wet Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) summer and winter midback fur samples was studied in a wind tunnel. A light wetting water spray simulated heavy fog, mist or light rain, while heavy soaking simulated heavy rain. Wind velocities ranged from 0 to 10 m . s -1 . Calf fur samples were from June, August and March. Adult fur samples were females from August and March. There was no evidence for increased heat loss from lightly wet fur relative to dry fur. Calm air conductance decreased for calf fur (P's < 0.05). Adult fur also decreased, however, the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Further, wind coefficients and regressions for lightly wet fur were similar or below those for dry fur. A thin water film forming on the fur surface may have caused this. It is unlikely that a light rain, fog or mist would cause increased heat loss for Svalbard reindeer, and no increase of metabolic heat production would be needed to maintain thermoregulation. Only the simulated heavy rain dramatically raised heat loss from the fur samples examined regardless of age or season, e.g., heavy soaking increased calm air conductance for all furs (P's < 0.05). This was likely due to the addition of evaporative heat loss from the fur surface and a reduction in the amount of trapped air within the fur. Windchill was of minor importance, since wind coefficients were generally close to zero, meaning increasing wind velocity only marginally raised heat loss even with the added effect of evaporative heat loss. Rain would cause greater insulation loss than increasing wind velocity in Svalbard reindeer of all ages, with the exception of calves under one month old, which could experience dramatic insulation loss from a combination of heavy rain and windchill. Dry or wet, Svalbard reindeer fur appears to provide better insulation than fur of others of their species.
“…However, of course, wetting of the pelt and wind may create a situation which is barely tolerated by infants (see e.g. Hart et al 1961). According to our data it is likely that shivering plays only a minor role in the heat production of a newly born calf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of air velocity, direction and wetness of the skin on heat loss were examined as well. Hart et al (1961) studied the metabolic and thermal responses of infant caribou. The metabolic rate was doubled by a lowering of temperature to 0°C, but cold combined with wind and precipitation was observed to elevate the metabolic rate to over 5 times the resting value at 20°C.…”
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB">The first issue/volume of Rangifer was published in autumn 1981 and contained six articles, two of them in English. Besides the scientific contributions, the publication included information about the mandates of the Nordic Council for Reindeer Research (NOR) and Rangifer. The aims of the journal were to give reindeer researchers possibilities for "high speed" publishing and to create a link between the researchers and the management/reindeer husbandry advisors to the best of the reindeer industry. Therefore abstracts were provided in several languages.</span></p>
“…The degree of thermoregulatory ability in neonates is dependent upon such factors as body size, thermal insulation, degree of neuro logical control and thermogenic capability at birth (Hull, 1973)-Large neonates, such as newborn lambs, have thermorsgu'iatory abiiiiies quite simi'iar to adults (Âlaxander, 1361, 1362aAlaxandsr and Williams, 1962), and are able to maintain homeocherrriy when subjected to ambient temperatures as low as -10 C. Newborn caribou, due to tneir large size and weii-deveioped thermal insulation, thermoregusate with no apparent difficulty and are In thermal danger in the arctic only under wet, windy conditions (Lentz and Hart, 1960;Hart et al, 1961).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.