2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of children’s first action when learning causal structure from exploratory play

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But participants given opposed moral arguments, a recency effect on adoption was observed [ 128 , 129 ]. Perhaps more relevantly, it has been hypothesised that the first piece of information observed or produced regarding a new topic or skill becomes an "anchoring hypothesis" that strongly affects subsequent behaviour and conclusions, and is difficult to reverse by subsequent information [ 130 , 131 ]. It would be interesting to explore whether the first variant learned becomes more strongly associated with the task than subsequent variants during learning, or whether this bias is elicited during remembering for production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But participants given opposed moral arguments, a recency effect on adoption was observed [ 128 , 129 ]. Perhaps more relevantly, it has been hypothesised that the first piece of information observed or produced regarding a new topic or skill becomes an "anchoring hypothesis" that strongly affects subsequent behaviour and conclusions, and is difficult to reverse by subsequent information [ 130 , 131 ]. It would be interesting to explore whether the first variant learned becomes more strongly associated with the task than subsequent variants during learning, or whether this bias is elicited during remembering for production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the fact that the dinosaur exhibition included both interactive and didactic (or static) elements allowed us to investigate how these different kinds of exhibits affected children’s engagement and their interactions with their caregivers. While much work in developmental psychology suggests that children learn effectively from hands-on experiences (e.g., Schulz et al, 2007 ; Chi, 2009 ; Lapidow and Walker, 2020 ; Nussenbaum et al, 2020 ; Sobel et al, 2022a ), static exhibits have different strengths and can also inspire children’s engagement in museums (e.g., Peart and Kool, 1988 ; Tunnicliffe and Scheersoi, 2009 ; Dancstep et al, 2015 ). One important question for the current study is thus the impact that these different kinds of experiences can have.…”
Section: Children’s Exploration In Museum Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants tend to direct their attention to events with intermediate complexity (supposedly to avoid wasting effort in processing overly simple or complex events; Kidd et al, 2012 ), prefer to interact with knowledgeable social partners (see Csibra and Gergely, 2009 ; Bazhydai et al, 2020 ), and are more likely to explore objects/events that violate their expectations and naïve theories (e.g., Stahl and Feigenson, 2015 ; Dunn and Bremner, 2017 ; Sim and Xu, 2017a ). Preschoolers selectively engage and spend more time exploring what they are uncertain about or what does not fit their prior beliefs (e.g., Schulz and Bonawitz, 2007 ; Bonawitz et al, 2012 ; Legare, 2012 ), preferentially rely on and query the most reliable informants (for reviews, see Mills, 2013 ; Harris et al, 2018 ), and start to use the knowledge of informative intervention to disambiguate causal structures (Schulz et al, 2007 ; Cook et al, 2011 ; McCormack et al, 2016 ; see also Sim and Xu, 2017b ; Lapidow and Walker, 2020 ; Sobel et al, 2022 ). These findings suggest that children's non-verbal information search is already pretty efficient and rather sophisticated at a very young age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%