2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of Chemyon on facework and conflict styles: Searching for the Korean face and its impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this study did not examine cultural factors in the analysis, it is possible to infer from the past research that the distinct cultures that dominate South Korea (i.e., Confucianism, nepotism, collectivism) have contributed to the formation of hasty discussions. In the context of cultural characteristics, South Koreans have a willingness to avoid conflicts and save face, known as Chemyon (Kim and Yang, 2011). Therefore, during a decision-making process, South Korean people may think that inviting the participation of many or prolonged discussion time would only bring confrontations, thus discounting the process of discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this study did not examine cultural factors in the analysis, it is possible to infer from the past research that the distinct cultures that dominate South Korea (i.e., Confucianism, nepotism, collectivism) have contributed to the formation of hasty discussions. In the context of cultural characteristics, South Koreans have a willingness to avoid conflicts and save face, known as Chemyon (Kim and Yang, 2011). Therefore, during a decision-making process, South Korean people may think that inviting the participation of many or prolonged discussion time would only bring confrontations, thus discounting the process of discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these values, communication styles in South Korea are non-confrontational, which leads Koreans to engage in high-context communication; for example, they do not explicitly point out others’ logical flaws. To help others save face—known as chemyon in Korean (Kim and Yang, 2011)—South Koreans prefer obscuring their positions as a communication strategy and thus creating ambiguous messages (Lint and Choi, 1996). This, in turn, produces more abstract messages than those in other countries such as the US, where a low-context culture dominates (Merkin, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, it is also worthwhile to note that Koreans are particularly sensitive to how others view and evaluate them, which is understood as chemyon (saving face or a sense of shame), which stems from Confucian culture and collectivism amid secular culture (Z.-N. Lee 1999). The chemyon culture, emphasizing external appearance rather than practicality, has been argued to hinder meaningful two-way communication or result in increased competition and conflicts with other groups in the Korean society (Y. Kim and Yang 2011).…”
Section: Social Construction and Place Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, South Koreans are known for their unique cultural and social characteristic, called Chemyon or "saving face" (i.e., Goffman, 1967), in which consumers are frequently seeking the endorsement or even approval of reference groups, especially in-groups (Y. Kim & Yang, 2011). The importance of Chemyon (or "saving face") in social relationships results in a strong desire to keeping ones' companions and finding themselves comfortable in conformity, ultimately leading to following others' consumption (Bak, 2017;Chitrakorn, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South Korea was chosen for our study given her lowest rank in individualism score (18) of all East Asian countries (Japan 46, China 20; Hofstede, 1991). Moreover, South Koreans are known for their unique cultural and social characteristic, called Chemyon or “saving face” (i.e., Goffman, 1967), in which consumers are frequently seeking the endorsement or even approval of reference groups, especially in-groups (Y. Kim & Yang, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%