The experiments of Biedermann (1887) and of Hoffmann (1914) on peripheral inhibition in crustacean muscle have given us an accessible preparation for the study of an inhibitory process. Since that time it has been clear that the discovery of a drug which blocked peripheral inhibition might open the way for a chemical understanding of the inhibitory process. A search for this drug was undertaken by Ellis, Thienes & Wiersma (1942) who tested numbers of chemicals without avail. So far only one drug has been found to block peripheral inhibition. The effective drug is picrotoxin (Van der Kloot, Robbins & Cooke, 1958).In this paper we shall give the reasons for believing that picrotoxin selectively interferes with the inhibitory process and shall report experiments conducted to uncover the site and manner of action of the drug. It is worth remembering at the onset that picrotoxin when injected into either a vertebrate or a crustacean (Florey, 1951) has a convulsant effect. Moreover, the physical events occurring in the crustacean peripheral inhibitory process resemble in many ways the physical events occurring at those inhibitory synapses of vertebrates which have been studied in detail (Eccles, 1957). These facts suggest that the action of picrotoxin on crayfish muscle may be of some general interest.
METHODSAnimals. The experiments were performed on the crayfish, OrconeAtes immunis (Hagen).The animals were collected near Ithaca, N.Y. Collections were made about every 4 days and the crayfish were stored in tanks of either pond or running tap water. Some of the crayfish were kept in a cold room at about 6°C and then brought slowly to room temperature before being used in an experiment.