The study of hydrogen sulfide formation by bacteria has long been handicapped by the lack of an accurate method for the quantitative estimation of very small quantities of the gas. The lead acetate paper test may be used where quantitative accuracy is of little importance, but this method is too crude for exact determnination. Lead and iron salts have been added directly to the culture media by various investigators (Wilson, 1923) as a qualitative and approximately quantitative test for differentiation purposes.Recently the determination of hydrogen sulfide by titration with standard iodine solution has been advocated. Heap and Cadness (1924) employed N/100 solutions of iodine, a stream of carbon dioxide being used to carry over the hydrogen sulfide. Fellers, Shostrom, and Clark (1924) recommend N/40 iodine solutions and separation of the hydrogen sulfide by means of a current of air. These methods are open to the objection that they are not sufficiently delicate and are not specific for hydrogen sulfide, as other substances may be oxidized by the iodine (mercaptans).With a method recently devised (Alny, 1925), hydrogen sulfide in quantities as small as 0.002 mgm. (2 micromilligrams) may be satisfactorily determined. The new procedure has the added advantage that, so far as we have been able to determine, it gives hydrogen sulfide only. The determination is accomplished by aeration of the acidified aqueous suspension or solution of the