The influence of blue crab movement on mark–recapture estimates of recreational harvest and exploitation

Abstract

Despite the need to quantify total catch to support sustainable fisheries management, estimating harvests of recreational fishers remains a challenge. Harvest estimates from mark–recapture studies have proven valuable, yet animal movements and migrations may bias some of these estimates. To improve recreational harvest estimates, explore seasonal and spatial harvest patterns, and understand the influence of animal movement on exploitation rates, we conducted a mark–recapture experiment for the blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) fishery in Maryland waters of Chesapeake Bay, USA. Data were analyzed with standard tag-return methods and with revised equations that accounted for crab movement between reporting areas. Using standard calculations, state-wide recreational harvest was estimated to be 4.04 million crabs. When movement was included in the calculations, the estimate was 5.39 million, an increase of 34%. With crab movement, recreational harvest in Maryland was estimated to be 6.5% of commercial harvest, a finding consistent with previous effort surveys. The new methods presented herein are broadly applicable for estimating recreational harvest in fisheries that target mobile species and for which spatial variation in commercial harvest is known.

Aquatic species shows asymmetric distribution range shifts in native and non-native areas

“…In the native range, the Atlantic blue crab stocks are overexploited along the northwest Atlantic coast (Aguilar et al, 2008;Semmler et al, 2021), while biotic interactions with the invasive European green crab Carcinus maenas (Linnaeus, 1758) exert additional pressure, mainly to juveniles (MacDonald et al, 2007). Nevertheless, at higher abundances, the Atlantic blue crab may be able to limit the invasion of the European green crab in North America (DeRivera et al, 2005).…”