2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of bioturbation by the sandprawn Callianassa kraussi on feeding and survival of the bivalve Eumarcia paupercula and the gastropod Nassarius kraussianus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, sediment turnover may prevent the development of microbial biofilms that bind sediments, thereby enhancing sediment erodability (Pater son & Hagerthey 2001) and resulting in microalgae that were attached to the sediment being washed into the water column (Pillay et al 2007c). Under natural and experimental conditions, sediment erodability is 2-to 3-fold greater in areas with dense beds of C. kraussi relative to sediments lacking this sandprawn (Pillay et al 2007a).The negative effects of Callichirus kraussi on microalgal biomass observed in this experiment are in agreement with previous field and laboratory experiments (Pillay et al 2007a). Under natural conditions, sediments lacking C. kraussi usually have microalgal biomasses 2-to 4-fold greater than those in areas occupied by this sandprawn, while experimental manipulations of C. kraussi densities resulted Our results indicate that by reducing microalgal biomass, Callichirus kraussi can also indirectly affect the growth of Liza richardsonii, leading to reductions in both fish biomass and length.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, sediment turnover may prevent the development of microbial biofilms that bind sediments, thereby enhancing sediment erodability (Pater son & Hagerthey 2001) and resulting in microalgae that were attached to the sediment being washed into the water column (Pillay et al 2007c). Under natural and experimental conditions, sediment erodability is 2-to 3-fold greater in areas with dense beds of C. kraussi relative to sediments lacking this sandprawn (Pillay et al 2007a).The negative effects of Callichirus kraussi on microalgal biomass observed in this experiment are in agreement with previous field and laboratory experiments (Pillay et al 2007a). Under natural conditions, sediments lacking C. kraussi usually have microalgal biomasses 2-to 4-fold greater than those in areas occupied by this sandprawn, while experimental manipulations of C. kraussi densities resulted Our results indicate that by reducing microalgal biomass, Callichirus kraussi can also indirectly affect the growth of Liza richardsonii, leading to reductions in both fish biomass and length.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This sandprawn feeds on organic material along its burrow walls and can burrow to depths greater than 1 m (Branch & Pringle 1987). Much research has been conducted on C. kraussi, and the engineering effects of this sandprawn have been shown to influence the abundance and distribution of bacteria, microalgae, meiofauna, macrofauna and seagrasses (Branch & Pringle 1987, Siebert & Branch 2005a,b, 2006, Pillay et al 2007a,b,c, 2008.In this experiment, we predict that sediment turnover by Callichirus kraussi will bury microalgae on the sediment surface and indirectly reduce food availability to Liza richardsonii, leading to reductions in the growth of this fish. This mechanism may explain the contrast in the abundance and biomass of L. richardsonii between areas with and without C. kraussi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhoads & Young (1970) have proposed that larvae of suspension feeders may be buried by sediment turned over by deposit feeders and used this as a mechanism to explain spatial separation between suspension feeders and deposit feeders. However, we propose that since the survival and body condition of suspension feeders are negatively affected by bioturbation (Pillay et al 2007a), their larvae may selectively reject sediments bioturbated by sandprawns by using poorly developed biofilms as a negative settlement cue, as such behaviour would increase their subsequent survival and feeding chances.…”
Section: Importance Of Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspension-feeding organisms have been shown to be susceptible to bioturbation because suspended sediments clog filtration apparatus and reduce filtration rates and body condition (Rhoads & Young 1970, Pillay et al 2007a). Rhoads & Young (1970) have proposed that larvae of suspension feeders may be buried by sediment turned over by deposit feeders and used this as a mechanism to explain spatial separation between suspension feeders and deposit feeders.…”
Section: Importance Of Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of our study, one species capable of these effects is the burrowing sandprawn Callianassa kraussi. This ecosystem engineer turns over sediment at prodigious rates (Branch & Pringle 1987), and its bioturbative activities are powerful structuring agents of marine communities (Siebert & Branch 2005a,b, 2006, 2007, Pillay et al 2007a,b,c, 2008. Bioturbation by this sandprawn negatively affects the abundance of Zostera capensis, and consequently the invertebrates intimately linked to it (Angel et al 2006, Siebert & Branch 2007.…”
Section: Changes In Abundance Of Wading Birds Between 1978 and 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%