2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13592-020-00803-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of available comb storage space on the performance of honey bee communication signals that regulate foraging

Abstract: Numerous activities within honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies rely on feedback loops for organization at the group level. Many of the processes associated with the feedback loops organizing a honey bee colony's activities are in striking parallel to other systems, such as intercellular interactions involved in motor neuron function, and principles derived from their study can be applied to these diverse fields, among others. This study looked at the communication signals honey bees employ while provisionin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have interpreted negative feedback as a mechanism to reduce recruitment to a resource based on some aspect of its quality, for example allowing unrewarded trails to be shut down [ 6 , 7 ], allowing recruitment to a crowded source of forage to be reduced [ 10 ], or transferring information that a forage patch may have an increased predation risk [ 8 , 11 ]. Subsequent studies have similarly focussed on the role of negative feedback in dealing with time-varying forage patches [ 12 , 13 ], or with the amount of available comb storage space [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have interpreted negative feedback as a mechanism to reduce recruitment to a resource based on some aspect of its quality, for example allowing unrewarded trails to be shut down [ 6 , 7 ], allowing recruitment to a crowded source of forage to be reduced [ 10 ], or transferring information that a forage patch may have an increased predation risk [ 8 , 11 ]. Subsequent studies have similarly focussed on the role of negative feedback in dealing with time-varying forage patches [ 12 , 13 ], or with the amount of available comb storage space [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%