2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Auditory Feedback and Vocal Rehabilitation on Prelingual Hearing-Impaired Individuals Post Cochlear Implant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease of F0 as a function of age can be explained by growth, longer length of time of exposure to sounds, and anatomical differences in the structure of the larynx and vocal tract. Audiological intervention, either with the use of a hearing aid or cochlear implant, plays a crucial role in the normalization of the above parameters [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The results of our study show a convergence with other researchers` studies performed with other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The decrease of F0 as a function of age can be explained by growth, longer length of time of exposure to sounds, and anatomical differences in the structure of the larynx and vocal tract. Audiological intervention, either with the use of a hearing aid or cochlear implant, plays a crucial role in the normalization of the above parameters [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The results of our study show a convergence with other researchers` studies performed with other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…According to the literature, the younger the age at implantation, the better the results on oral language. 21 Some studies provide evidence of better speech and language development in children implanted before the age of 3 years than that in children implanted after this age, 22 23 but some show greater efficacy of implantation before 1 year of age. Dettman et al compared children implanted at 12 months of age and younger with children implanted between the ages of 13 and 24 months and found superior receptive and expressive language development among the younger implantees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21]. Some studies provide evidence of better speech and language development in children implanted before the age of 3 years than that in children implanted after this age [22,23], but some show greater efficacy of implantation before 1 year of age.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it is highlighted that this hypothesis was not tested in the present research because muscle strength assessments were not performed. Even so, a study that analyzed the effects of age on the production of formants demonstrated changes in the formant frequencies, especially F2, relating age to the decrease in the participants' tongue muscle tone (23) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%