Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of atrial flutter in automated detection of atrial arrhythmias - are we ready to go into clinical practice?”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most ML models used ECG input signal for AF detection (Agliari et al, 2020; Alhusseini et al, 2020; Buscema et al, 2020; Domazetoski et al, 2022; K. He et al, 2022; Huang et al, 2021; Nickelsen et al, 2017; Pérez‐Valero et al, 2019; Rad et al, 2021; Rouhi et al, 2021; Schaefer et al, 2014; Wesselius et al, 2022; Yao et al, 2021). Abdul‐Kadir et al (2016) developed an AF recognition method based on dynamic ECG features extracted using the concept of a second‐order dynamic system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most ML models used ECG input signal for AF detection (Agliari et al, 2020; Alhusseini et al, 2020; Buscema et al, 2020; Domazetoski et al, 2022; K. He et al, 2022; Huang et al, 2021; Nickelsen et al, 2017; Pérez‐Valero et al, 2019; Rad et al, 2021; Rouhi et al, 2021; Schaefer et al, 2014; Wesselius et al, 2022; Yao et al, 2021). Abdul‐Kadir et al (2016) developed an AF recognition method based on dynamic ECG features extracted using the concept of a second‐order dynamic system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ML models used ECG input signal for AF detection (Agliari et al, 2020;Alhusseini et al, 2020;Buscema et al, 2020;Domazetoski et al, 2022;K. He et al, 2022;Huang et al, 2021;Nickelsen et al, 2017;Pérez-Valero et al, 2019;Rad et al, 2021;Rouhi et al, 2021;Schaefer et al, 2014;Wesselius et al, 2022;Yao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Atrial Fibrillation Detection With Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have proposed models for the diagnosis of arrhythmias using Chapman data also used in the present study. The accuracy of DNN [ 43 ], CNN Trees [ 44 ], Meta CNN Trees [ 45 ], Single Classifier [ 46 ], 1-D CNN [ 47 ], RNN [ 48 ], XGBoost [ 49 ], Teacher and Student [ 50 ] models was 92.24%, 97.60%, 98.29%, 92.89%, 94.01%, 96.21%, 89.40%, 98.96%, and 98.13%, respectively. While our proposed GCN-MI had a higher accuracy (99.71%) this may be due to the consideration of the structure of leads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%