2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of anisotropy on brain injury prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Horgan 2004; Mao et al 2010; Wright and Ramesh 2012) Other studies did note a slight increase in axon tensile strains when gray and white matter property distinctions were included compared to global isotropy, (Cloots et al 2012; Cloots et al 2013; Colgan et al 2010) however, these differences were small when compared with differences between maximum principal tissue strain and tract-oriented strain. (Giordano et al 2014) Importantly, when we compare our oriented axonal strain injury thresholds to in vitro thresholds, we find very good concurrence, underscoring that the axon-oriented strain distribution is resolved reasonably well with the isotropic model.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…(Horgan 2004; Mao et al 2010; Wright and Ramesh 2012) Other studies did note a slight increase in axon tensile strains when gray and white matter property distinctions were included compared to global isotropy, (Cloots et al 2012; Cloots et al 2013; Colgan et al 2010) however, these differences were small when compared with differences between maximum principal tissue strain and tract-oriented strain. (Giordano et al 2014) Importantly, when we compare our oriented axonal strain injury thresholds to in vitro thresholds, we find very good concurrence, underscoring that the axon-oriented strain distribution is resolved reasonably well with the isotropic model.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…54 This is unlikely to significantly alter the relative magnitudes of the different WM injury susceptibility indices we established, however. On the other hand, it must be recognized that brain material properties represent only a narrow subset of the many variables important to predict injury (others include, e.g., injury tolerances, on-field impacts, neuroimaging, and clinical diagnosis of concussion, etc.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…First, the fiber strain magnitude appears to be dominated by WM structural anisotropy rather than material anisotropy, 54 suggesting that focusing on the former via tractography is appropriate for our current ''technique development'' study. Second, although the baseline DHIM is subject-specific, we intend to use it for population-based studies as well-e.g., via the pre-computed brain response atlas (pcBRA 32,46,76 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details about model validation are reported in “Appendix 1.” Further detail can be found in the publication by Giordano et al. (2014), Giordano and Kleiven (2014), Giordano and Kleiven (2016). Tables 1, 2 and 3 describe the material models used in the simulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015) was that the anisotropic properties of the brain were extracted from diffusion data of a single healthy subject (Giordano et al. 2014) or from average diffusion data of 12 healthy subjects (Sahoo et al. 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%