1995
DOI: 10.1002/srin.199501090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of aluminium deoxidation and sulphur content on oxide modification and machinability of steel

Abstract: The influence of Al‐deoxidation and various amounts of sulphur on Ca‐treated steel has been investigated. The effect of sulphur ar aluminium on the modification of oxide inclusions has been reasoned by theoretical thermodynamic equilibrium analysis. The type inclusion formed depends on the aluminium and sulphur contents. For complete oxide shape control in which CaO‐rich inclusions forr the sulphur content must be relatively low for Al‐killed steel. The oxide inclusion type of the experiments was in surprising… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the activity of metallic element such as silicon and titanium was calculated based on the following classical Wagner formalism using the first-and secondorder interaction parameters, which are listed in Table 3. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . (4) where f M , e and r is, respectively, the Henrian activity coefficient of element M, and the first-and second-order interaction parameters between each element.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the activity of metallic element such as silicon and titanium was calculated based on the following classical Wagner formalism using the first-and secondorder interaction parameters, which are listed in Table 3. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . (4) where f M , e and r is, respectively, the Henrian activity coefficient of element M, and the first-and second-order interaction parameters between each element.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific description and details regarding the associate model and parameters are found in the recent [21] 0.056 0.035 [22] 0.043 0.016 [23] -0.30 [12] -1.98 [18] (39.82) Ti 0.029 [24] -0.025 [25] -0.043 0.024 [23] 0.042 -1.27 [12] * -1.62 [26] (-0.36) Si -0.021 [19] 0.10 -0.007* 0.058 -0.013* -0.11* -0.12 Mg 0.022 [12] -0.096 [12] --0.27 [12] -0.64 [12] -560 [27] (145,000) O -0.032 [28] -0.066 -0.037 [29] -1.17 [18] (-0.010) -0.54 [26] (0.039) -370 [27] Mi : [45] . (Table II).…”
Section: Compound) ''Ftoxid'' (Fact Oxide) and ''Fsstel'' (Factsagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] log f M ¼ X where f M , e, and r are, respectively, the Henrian activity coefficient of element M, and the first-and second-order interaction parameters between each element. In Figure 2, the activities of oxygen calculated from the Table II.…”
Section: A Thermodynamics Of Deoxidation and Inclusion Composition Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated values of e j i in Fe-36%Ni for i and j as O, Mn, Si, Al and C are presented in Table 1 along with the ones used in iron [7][8][9][10] and nickel [1,2,[11][12][13] as the input data. Because the interaction parameters in nickel are known only for few elements, one can not calculate all the parameters in Fe-36%Ni, as it is seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Description Of Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%