2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Accrual Volume and National Cancer Institute-Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI-CCC) Designation on Outcome for the RTOG 91-11 Intergroup Trial for Laryngeal Preservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 In a secondary analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 3-arm study 91-11 for laryngeal preservation, patients treated at regional centers vs National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers had similar outcomes in time to laryngectomy and overall survival. 9 The findings from this analysis underscore the NCCN recommendation that enrollment in clinical trials should be encouraged. Although the secondary analysis of 91-11 data is still under way, it supports the supposition that well-designed trials with stringent quality control at each participating center can produce similar outcomes for patients regardless of the institution or patient volume.…”
Section: Strategies For Improving Quality Of Carementioning
confidence: 62%
“…2 In a secondary analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 3-arm study 91-11 for laryngeal preservation, patients treated at regional centers vs National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers had similar outcomes in time to laryngectomy and overall survival. 9 The findings from this analysis underscore the NCCN recommendation that enrollment in clinical trials should be encouraged. Although the secondary analysis of 91-11 data is still under way, it supports the supposition that well-designed trials with stringent quality control at each participating center can produce similar outcomes for patients regardless of the institution or patient volume.…”
Section: Strategies For Improving Quality Of Carementioning
confidence: 62%