2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Abrasive Grit Morphology on Wheel Topography and Grinding Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hitchiner et al showed the influence of grit properties and bond strength when grinding with cBN grits of variable toughness under fixed dressing conditions [9]. Palmer et al evaluated different engineered-shape grains with conventional abrasives under various dressing conditions [10] and found that an elongated grit generates the largest workpiece R a surface roughness, which they attributed to an increased penetration depth. While the research about the influence of grit and bond properties on grinding performance is clear, particularly with regard to grit wear, little work has been done on how these same properties influence the grinding-wheel topography, which is the fundamental causal mechanism for differences in grinding performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hitchiner et al showed the influence of grit properties and bond strength when grinding with cBN grits of variable toughness under fixed dressing conditions [9]. Palmer et al evaluated different engineered-shape grains with conventional abrasives under various dressing conditions [10] and found that an elongated grit generates the largest workpiece R a surface roughness, which they attributed to an increased penetration depth. While the research about the influence of grit and bond properties on grinding performance is clear, particularly with regard to grit wear, little work has been done on how these same properties influence the grinding-wheel topography, which is the fundamental causal mechanism for differences in grinding performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the effect of dressing parameters on wheel sharpness and grinding outputs has been well researched for a given grit-bond combination, the effect of grit type, bond type, grit properties and bond properties on dressing action has not. Indeed, different bonds and grit and bond properties all react differently to a given set of dressing conditions [10]. Therefore, one of the main objectives of this work is to develop an assessment framework for evaluating the performance of grinding wheels that can capture the effects of grinding wheel topography, with a special focus on the influence of grit type, grit properties and dressing conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface Roughness Rz (m) The results from Figure 16 suggest that the flood grinding, MQL-PO, MQL-MG, and MQL-Al 2 O 3 modes generate relatively higher average values of surface roughness when compared to dry grinding mode. Palmer et al [44] reported that grinding tool topography has a critical impact on ground surface, with the differences between various tool topographies causing the variation in surface responses. The tool topography for flood grinding mode showed new cutting edges generated by the formation of wedge-shaped fractures (Figure 6), which produced uneven ground surface that increased the values of surface roughness.…”
Section: Grinding Surface Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even so, the well-trained model is still hardly adaptive to a new life cycle of the wheel due to the diverse uncertainties in the dressing process of grinding wheel. 26 Initial topography of wheel and the degradation of grinding performance are different for different life cycles, even if the same dressing parameters are adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%