2019
DOI: 10.3390/w11081731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of a Water Absorbing Geocomposite on Soil Water Retention and Soil Matric Potential

Abstract: Climate change induces droughts that are becoming more intensive and more frequent than ever before. Most of the available forecast tools predict a further significant increase in the risk of drought, which indicates the need to prepare solutions to mitigate its effects. Growing water scarcity is now one of the world’s leading challenges. In agriculture and environmental engineering, in order to increase soil water retention, soil additives are used. In this study, the influence of a newly developed water abso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most soil conditioners used in order to retain water are of organic origin i.e., clay minerals like kaolinite, montmorillonite, mica, bentonite, zeolite and attapulgite [ 7 , 8 ]. Crystalline swelling of clay minerals is mainly associated with unsaturated conditions, where water potential is controlled by partial vapor pressure, but it may also occur under saturated conditions, where the liquid water potential is controlled by high osmotic suction [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most soil conditioners used in order to retain water are of organic origin i.e., clay minerals like kaolinite, montmorillonite, mica, bentonite, zeolite and attapulgite [ 7 , 8 ]. Crystalline swelling of clay minerals is mainly associated with unsaturated conditions, where water potential is controlled by partial vapor pressure, but it may also occur under saturated conditions, where the liquid water potential is controlled by high osmotic suction [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, in the experiment under analysis in this paper, evaporation after two days, for a sample in the case of which a dose of 1000 cm 3 of water was injected to the depth of 5 cm, amounted to 2.6 mm. A notably higher intensity of evaporation under laboratory conditions was obtained in a study by Śpitalniak et al [ 67 ], in which experiments were conducted on a soil material with particle size distribution of its mineral parts corresponding to that of loamy sand, i.e., identical to that used in the experiment analysed herein. After two days, water loss relative to the surface of the sample was as much as 18.5 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The sensors were in the effective root zone at locations that provided a representative picture of the soil water status in the depths of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 m. During the nut setting, surface irrigation was applied by micro sprinklers placed at a height of 0.3 m above the soil surface. Additionally, Irrometer™ tensiometers were used to measure the potential of soil water and its changes in the soil profile [26][27][28]. Values were measured in kilopascals [kPa].…”
Section: Field Measurements 231 Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%