2015
DOI: 10.1071/wf14052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of a variable fire regime on woodland structure and composition

Abstract: The post-fire response of vegetation reflects not only a single fire event but is the result of cumulative effects of previous fires in the landscape. For effective ecological fire management there is a need to better understand the relationship between different fire regimes and vegetation structure. The study investigated how different fire regimes affect stand structure and composition in subtropical eucalypt woodlands of central Queensland. We found that fire history category (i.e. specific combinations of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding impacts of fire on the spatial and temporal distribution of critical resources is essential for predicting the processes and patterns of population recovery, and the likely sensitivity of species to fire size and frequency. However, an important extension to the research in this study will be to understand how the specific components of fire regimes influence the availability and spatial distribution of critical resources (Bassett et al , Burgess et al ). For instance, the time since the most recent fire can be an important determinant of vegetation cover (such as ground‐level shelter for the bush rat) and foliage availability, while hollow‐bearing tree recruitment can be sensitive to short inter‐fire intervals (Banks et al , Haslem et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding impacts of fire on the spatial and temporal distribution of critical resources is essential for predicting the processes and patterns of population recovery, and the likely sensitivity of species to fire size and frequency. However, an important extension to the research in this study will be to understand how the specific components of fire regimes influence the availability and spatial distribution of critical resources (Bassett et al , Burgess et al ). For instance, the time since the most recent fire can be an important determinant of vegetation cover (such as ground‐level shelter for the bush rat) and foliage availability, while hollow‐bearing tree recruitment can be sensitive to short inter‐fire intervals (Banks et al , Haslem et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in habitat can negatively affect food supplies, refuges, oviposition and foraging sites, and modify interspecific competition and predation rates as well as niche availability which in turn results in assemblage simplification (Blanche et al ., ). Simplification can be result of short‐term post fire (Burgess et al ., ; Gibson & Hulbert, ), as well as result of heavy or over‐grazing (Swengel, ). Sasal et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings on floral responses to either fire or grazing in savannahs (Van Klink et al ., ; Hanke et al ., ; Rutherford & Powrie, ) show that fire, for instance, can induce simplification in habitat structure (Grant et al ., ; Burgess et al ., ; Souza et al ., ). Here, fire generally opens the habitat or may cause an increase in shrub diversity in the long run (Safford & Harrison, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Vegetation communities will respond differently to the fire regime imposed on them (Burgess et al 2014; Kelly et al 2017), and this in turn will influence habitat structure and availability for mammal assemblages (Fox 1982; Griffiths & Brook 2014; Chia et al 2016). High fire frequency regimes in forested plant communities generally diminish understory and mid‐story species and have the potential to transform plant communities from a shrubby understory to a grassy understory with limited structural complexity (Catling et al 2001; Watson & Morris, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%