2020
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inflated mitochondrial genomes of siphonous green algae reflect processes driving expansion of noncoding DNA and proliferation of introns

Abstract: Within the siphonous green algal order Bryopsidales, the size and gene arrangement of chloroplast genomes has been examined extensively, while mitochondrial genomes have been mostly overlooked. The recently published mitochondrial genome of Caulerpa lentillifera is large with expanded noncoding DNA, but it remains unclear if this is characteristic of the entire order. Our study aims to evaluate the evolutionary forces shaping organelle genome dynamics in the Bryopsidales based on the C. lentillifera and Ostreo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
3
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of U. compressa mitogenome size was mainly caused by differences in the content of genome-specific free-standing orf s (sfORFs), both group I and II introns, and the non-coding intergenic spacer regions (Figure 2). The content of non-coding spacer in U. compressa mitogenomes was 22.29-26.93% (Figure 2), which was within the known range for Ulva mitogenomes (20.51-32.94%), but was lower than the mitogenomes of Bryopsidales (34.8-46.0%) (Zheng et al, 2018;Repetti et al, 2020), Ulotrichales (43.3-49.0%) (Pombert et al, 2004;Turmel et al, 2016), and Oltmannsiellopsidales (34.1%) (Pombert et al, 2006), displaying the most compact architectures among the Ulvophyceae so far. The overall A + T content in the United States sample (Uco1) was 61.96%, which was the lowest value recorded in Ulva mitogenomes sequenced so far (Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Comparison Of Genome Features In U Compressa Mitogenomessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variation of U. compressa mitogenome size was mainly caused by differences in the content of genome-specific free-standing orf s (sfORFs), both group I and II introns, and the non-coding intergenic spacer regions (Figure 2). The content of non-coding spacer in U. compressa mitogenomes was 22.29-26.93% (Figure 2), which was within the known range for Ulva mitogenomes (20.51-32.94%), but was lower than the mitogenomes of Bryopsidales (34.8-46.0%) (Zheng et al, 2018;Repetti et al, 2020), Ulotrichales (43.3-49.0%) (Pombert et al, 2004;Turmel et al, 2016), and Oltmannsiellopsidales (34.1%) (Pombert et al, 2006), displaying the most compact architectures among the Ulvophyceae so far. The overall A + T content in the United States sample (Uco1) was 61.96%, which was the lowest value recorded in Ulva mitogenomes sequenced so far (Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Comparison Of Genome Features In U Compressa Mitogenomessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…All of the genes annotated in Uco2-5 were coded on the same strand and shared a high level of conservation in gene synteny, as was the same as that in the other Ulva mitogenomes (Melton et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2017), but was different from the mitogenomes of Ulotrichales, Bryopsidales and Oltmannsiellopsidales which had their genes distributed on the two strands (Pombert et al, 2006;Turmel et al, 2016;Repetti et al, 2020). However, a locally collinear block of eight genes (rps11-rps19-rps4-rpl16-trnR-trnQ-trnE-trnS) with the size of 3,631 bp has been inverted only in Uco1 (Figure 6), indicating that this rearrangement event happened after its divergence from Uco2-5.…”
Section: Repeat Sequences and Intraspecific Genome Rearrangementmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transcriptome data of Ostreobium , assembled using Trinity v2.9.1 [65] in the de novo mode, were obtained from an earlier published work [66]. Using the genome assembly generated in this study, the transcriptome (RNA-Seq) reads (GenBank BioProject accession PRJEB35267) were assembled using Trinity in the “genome-guided” mode.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common family of GC-rich repeat elements, many of which are palindromic (i.e., a sequences that can be folded into hairpin structures), have spread throughout the H. lacustris mtDNA and ptDNA, resulting in the unprecedented situation whereby these two different genomes are largely made up of matching sequences (Zhang et al, 2019). The proliferation of these elements has resulted in extremely high organelle GC compositions (∼50%) (Smith, 2012) as well as severe genome expansion-the plastome of H. lacustris, at 1.35 Mb, is the largest on record (Bauman et al, 2018;Smith, 2018) and its mtDNA (124.6 kb) is among the biggest from green algae (Zhang et al, 2019;Repetti et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%