2017
DOI: 10.4064/aa8147-2-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The infinitude of $\mathbb {Q}(\sqrt {-p})$ with class number divisible by 16

Abstract: Abstract. The density of primes p such that the class number h of Q( √ −p) is divisible by 2 k is conjectured to be 2 −k for all positive integers k. The conjecture is true for 1 ≤ k ≤ 3 but still open for k ≥ 4. For primes p of the form p = a 2 + c 4 with c even, we describe the 8-Hilbert class field of Q( √ −p) in terms of a and c. We then adapt a theorem of Friedlander and Iwaniec to show that there are infinitely many primes p for which h is divisible by 16, and also infinitely many primes p for which h is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we are able to show, in Theorem 2, that the density of primes such that exists and is equal to . It is proved unconditionally in [Mil17a] that there are infinitely many primes such that , but that result implies nothing about the density as in Theorem 1.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Nevertheless, we are able to show, in Theorem 2, that the density of primes such that exists and is equal to . It is proved unconditionally in [Mil17a] that there are infinitely many primes such that , but that result implies nothing about the density as in Theorem 1.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Then, putting together the formulas above, we deduce that , and let f (p, q; r, s, e) be defined as in (23). If e = (0, 0), then…”
Section: Strategy For the Proof Of The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, given a vector e = (e 1 , e 2 ) ∈ F 2 2 and p, q, r, and s as above, define (23) f (p, q) = f (p, q; r, s, e) := c(p, q; r, s)χ p (q) e1 ε(p, q) e2 .…”
Section: Strategy For the Proof Of The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation