The industry 4.0 standards landscape from a semantic integration perspective

Grangel-González, Irlán; Baptista, Paul; Halilaj, Lavdim; Lohmann, Steffen; Vidal, María-Esther; Mader, Christian; Auer, Sören

doi:10.1109/etfa.2017.8247584

Cited by 57 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The approach is exemplified through an air defense application. Within Industry 4.0, RDF has also been suggested as a means of achieving interoperability (Bedenbender et al, 2016;Grangel-Gonzalez et al, 2017).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achieving System‐of‐Systems Interoperability Levels Using Linked Data and Ontologies

Axelsson

2020

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interoperability is a key concern in systems‐of‐systems (SoS). Numerous frameworks have been proposed to deal with this, but they are generally on a high level and do not provide specific guidance for technical implementation. However, in the context of simulation, the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM) has been proposed. Also, the semantic web initiative has been introduced to provide description logic information to web pages. This paper investigates how these two concepts can be combined into a general approach for SoS interoperability. It also expands on the LCIM model by providing more details about the world models of a system and its content on the higher levels of interoperability. The combination is illustrated using an example of autonomous vehicles, and experiences from other applications are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achieving System‐of‐Systems Interoperability Levels Using Linked Data and Ontologies

Axelsson

2020

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…I4.0 specifies a standard nomenclature for manufacturing specific services, such as welding, drilling, etc. This is based on a large number of preexisting standards for manufacturing . In other domains, such as construction, with less well‐defined terminology, the domain‐specific taxonomies remain to be formalized and standardized.…”

Section: Frames Of Referencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is based on a large number of preexisting standards for manufacturing. 16,17 In other domains, such as construction, with less well-defined terminology, the domain-specific taxonomies remain to be formalized and standardized.…”

Section: Asset Administration Shellsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Architecting systems‐of‐systems and their constituents: A case study applying Industry 4.0 in the construction domain

Axelsson

Fröberg

Eriksson

2019

Systems Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of system‐of‐systems (SoS) requires a continuous interplay between design decisions on the SoS level and those on the level of its constituent systems (CS), which often preexist and need to be adapted as the SoS evolves. This involves not only preparing the CS to participate in a particular SoS, but also designing the CS architecture to make it easily adaptable to a future SoS context. The problem is in part addressed in an emerging SoS framework in the manufacturing domain called Industry 4.0. It focuses on connected and digitalized production with the ambition of increasing flexibility and efficiency. This paper investigates how Industry 4.0 standards can be used in an SoS context to make CS more flexible and adaptive, and evaluates their usefulness outside manufacturing. The study is based on a case from the construction domain, for which a generic SoS architecture is developed. Several extensions and adaptations of Industry 4.0 are suggested, including specifications of ontologies for missions and workflows.

show abstract

“…Industry, in general, is accepting the incorporation of the new technologies, networks and communication protocols to modernize its systems and allow a wider connection from anywhere, at any time and in anyhow. There are already several related works reflecting this progress [66,30,19,65,16], in which multiple cyber-physical devices interact with control processes and manufacturing chains for greater production, distribution and quality of service. This technological confluence is mainly based on the new paradigms of the Internet of Things (IoT), such as the Industrial IoT (IIoT), and the new edge computing infrastructures, such as cloud and fog computing [34]; all of them working as part of a heterogeneous network where Information Technologies (IT) merge with the Operational Technologies (OT), in order to maximize, optimize and customize the production tasks, and offer a greater range of functional possibilities and services for a better industrial sector, economy and society [21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secure Interconnection of IT-OT Networks in Industry 4.0

Alcaraz

2019

Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasingly, the society is witnessing how today's industry is adapting the new technologies and communication protocols to offer more optimal and reliable services to end-users, with support for inter-domain communication belonging to diverse critical infrastructures. As a consequence of this technological revolution, interconnection mechanisms are required to offer transparency in the connections and protection in the different application domains, without this implying a significant degradation of the control requirements. Therefore, this book chapter presents a reference architecture for the new Industry 4.0 where the interconnection core is mainly concentrated in the Policy Decision Points (PDP), which can be deployed in high volume data processing and storage technologies such as cloud and fog servers. Each PDP authorizes actions in the field/plant according to a set of factors (entities, context and risks) computed through the existing access control measures, such as RBAC+ABAC+Risk-BAC (Role/Attribute/Risk-Based Access Control, respectively), to establish coordinated and constrained accesses in extreme situations. Part of these actions also includes proactive risk assessment measures to respond to anomalies or intrusive threats in time.

show abstract

The industry 4.0 standards landscape from a semantic integration perspective

Cited by 57 publications

References 15 publications

Achieving System‐of‐Systems Interoperability Levels Using Linked Data and Ontologies

Achieving System‐of‐Systems Interoperability Levels Using Linked Data and Ontologies

Architecting systems‐of‐systems and their constituents: A case study applying Industry 4.0 in the construction domain

Secure Interconnection of IT-OT Networks in Industry 4.0

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About