2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015213511549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Industrial Project Method in French Industry and in French Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…67). The main pedagogical construct for implementing PBL in the classroom is the project, which may appear in various configurations from a singular activity lasting several weeks, to an evolving activity to be completed along the academic year or even 2 years (as described in Verner & Betzer, 2001, or Ginestie, 2002. Briefly stated, PBL can be characterized as:…”
Section: Cognitive Aspects Of Technological Problem-solving (Tps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…67). The main pedagogical construct for implementing PBL in the classroom is the project, which may appear in various configurations from a singular activity lasting several weeks, to an evolving activity to be completed along the academic year or even 2 years (as described in Verner & Betzer, 2001, or Ginestie, 2002. Briefly stated, PBL can be characterized as:…”
Section: Cognitive Aspects Of Technological Problem-solving (Tps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research examined different facets in the educational implementation of PBL, e.g., thinking patterns and processes by students dealing with complex projects (Blumenfeld et al, 1991); reflection and evaluation while designing (Williams & Williams, 1997); decision making and generation of optimal solutions (Evensen & Cindy, 2000); solution modification/evaluation cycles by students (Mioduser & Kiperman, 2002); teamwork (Perrenet, Bouhuijs, & Smits, 2000) and comparison between individual and collaborative design processes (Hill & Howard, 1998); different curricular configurations of PBL (e.g., Edgerton, 1993;Ginestie, 2002;Litchfield, 1995;Verner & Betzer, 2001;Williams, 2002). From all different perspectives, there is strong agreement as regards to the educational potential of PBL in technology education.…”
Section: Cognitive Aspects Of Technological Problem-solving (Tps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Frank et al (2003) stated that this guidance has not to be understood as transmitting new materials and facts to students, but to be understood as arising students' motivation to succeed, teaching how to learn and how to construct knowledge. After a survey in French schools about project work Ginestié (2002), found out that teachers spent most of time for guidance and He concluded that it is not really efficient in respect of building effective learning. Because it doesn't give any chance to students to overcome challenge confronted in learning process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In schools, technology activities are often presented as practical problem-solving activities where students develop ideas and technological solutions collaboratively. This approach has emerged as central to technology education in providing contexts for learning that reflect the authentic process of developing technological solutions (Blomdahl and Rogala 2008;Ginestié 2002;Hill 1998).…”
Section: Technology Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%