2004
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m404949200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Induction of Cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) in the Human Liver and Intestine Is Mediated by the Xenobiotic Sensors Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) and Constitutively Activated Receptor (CAR)

Abstract: Induction of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) by xenobiotics may lead to clinically relevant drug interactions. In contrast with other CYP3A family members, studies on the inducibility of CYP3A5 indicate conflicting results. We report the induction of CYP3A5 mRNA in 13 of 16 hepatocyte preparations exposed to rifampin. Furthermore, induction of CYP3A5 mRNA was observed in intestinal biopsies in three of eight probands following exposure to the antibiotic. The highest absolute levels of CYP3A5 transcripts were found … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
123
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
123
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However in rats, PXR agonists L-742694 and DEX increased Cyp3a1/23 and Cyp3a18 in liver, but decreased Cyp3a1/23 and Cyp3a18 in intestine (Hartley et al, 2004). In humans, PXR agonist rifampicin induced CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 expression in both human liver and intestine (Greiner et al, 1999;Burk et al, 2004). Therefore, Cyp3a/CYP3A regulation is similar in liver between rodents and humans, whereas their regulation in intestine is variable between species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However in rats, PXR agonists L-742694 and DEX increased Cyp3a1/23 and Cyp3a18 in liver, but decreased Cyp3a1/23 and Cyp3a18 in intestine (Hartley et al, 2004). In humans, PXR agonist rifampicin induced CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 expression in both human liver and intestine (Greiner et al, 1999;Burk et al, 2004). Therefore, Cyp3a/CYP3A regulation is similar in liver between rodents and humans, whereas their regulation in intestine is variable between species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These promoter fragments introduce an NheI and a BamHI restriction site at the 5Ј-and 3Ј-ends, respectively, and were inserted into the NheI and BglII sites of the pGL3-Basic luciferase reporter gene vector, thereby destroying the 3Ј-restriction site (Goodwin et al, 1999) for subsequent reporter constructs. The 737-bp CYP3A5 promoter fragment (Ϫ688/ϩ49 from the transcription start site) (Burk et al, 2004) was generated from C 2 bbe1 genomic DNA using cloning primers (forward, 5Ј-aca gct agc aga tct atc acc aca gag tca gag ggg atg-3Ј; reverse, 5Ј-cat gga tcc gct gtt tgc tgg gct gtt tgc ctg g-3Ј), introducing an NheI-BglII tandem restriction site at the 5Ј-end and BamHI site at the 3Ј-end. This was similarly inserted into the NheI and BglII sites of pGL3-Basic vector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the PXR-and CAR-dependent induction of CYP3A4 is enhanced by GR [25,26]. Compared with CYP3A4, CYP3A5 may be a relatively minor enzyme in the human small bowel, and appears to be less sensitive to induction by PXR activators because it lacks the distal PXRresponse element cluster shown to enhance the transcription of CYP3A4 by xenobiotics [27,28].Yu et al [12] found that tanshinone IIA and cryptotanshinone were efficacious activators for human PXR, GR was also involved in the trans-activation of the CYP3A4 promoter by cryptotanshinone and tanshinone IIA, and CAR played a role in tanshinone IIA-mediated CYP3A4 induction. The in vitro study results reported are consistent with our in vivo findings here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%