2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59745-9_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Indonesian Gravity Field and the Geoid Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GPS measurements: a differential global positioning system (GPS), Trimble R6, was used to measure the precise coordinates (x, y, z) of the well head (or any other fixed landmark), based on the satellite signals received both at the rover and base stations (Parkinson and Spilker 1996). The geoid height is corrected considering the gradient of the local geoid (Kasenda et al 2000). Then, the ellipsoid height measurements are converted into meters above sea level (m a.s.l.)…”
Section: Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPS measurements: a differential global positioning system (GPS), Trimble R6, was used to measure the precise coordinates (x, y, z) of the well head (or any other fixed landmark), based on the satellite signals received both at the rover and base stations (Parkinson and Spilker 1996). The geoid height is corrected considering the gradient of the local geoid (Kasenda et al 2000). Then, the ellipsoid height measurements are converted into meters above sea level (m a.s.l.)…”
Section: Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the official name of the Indonesian Geoid Model 1996 (INDGED96), it was constructed by tailoring different sources of gravity measurements (Kahar et al 1997). The dataset consisted of more than 200,000 terrestrial gravity points and 150,000 marine gravity points (Kasenda et al 2000). Despite the huge number of gravity data used from the dataset for geoid modeling, limitations still could not be avoided, i.e., the uneven distribution of gravity measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, INDGED96 showed a relatively poor geoid model accuracy at one region compared with other regions. For example, the difference between gravimetric and geometric geoid (height difference between geodetic height obtained from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and orthometric height observed from leveling) in Java Island was ranging from 0.2 to 1.0 m, while in Sumatra island was ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 m (Kahar et al 1997;Kasenda et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%