The Indigenismo of the Peruvian Aprista Party: A Reinterpretation

Davies, Thomas M.

doi:10.2307/2512054

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although, in addition to Klaren's excellent study, a few suggestive partial analyses of APRA are available in books dealing with Peruvian history or politics in general (Basadre, 1968;Bourricaud, 1967) and in a few articles (Bourricaud, 1966;Davies, 1971), the myth and the reality of APRA remain to be satisfactorily clarified. Haya's role and significance as party leader are also in need of critical evaluation-a task that cannot be accomplished without seriously studying the best of both the Right and the Left critiques.…”

Section: Peruvians and North Americans Who Authored This Literature Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Peruvian Aprista Party and Haya de la Torre

North¹

1975

J. inter-Am. stud. world aff.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Center for Latin American Studies at the University of Miami is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs.

show abstract

Section: Peruvians and North Americans Who Authored This Literature Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Peruvian Aprista Party and Haya de la Torre

North¹

1975

J. inter-Am. stud. world aff.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, for elections see Lott (1957), Taylor (1960), Borricaud (1964), Gil and Parrish (1965), Martz (1967), Soares (1967), Parrish et al (1967, Schmitt (1969), Lopez Pintor ( ), McDonald (1971( , 1972a( , 1972b, Sinding (1972), Harkness and Pinzon de Lewin (1 LJ75), Isuani and Cervini (1 LJ75), Prothro and Chaparro (1 LJ75), and Valenzuela (I LJ77). For political parties see: Taylor (1 LJ:14) , Fitzgibbon CI 957), Alexander (1964, 1LJ69), Martz (1964Martz ( ,1972, Tugwell (1965), Horowitz (1965), Williams (1967), Ranis (1968), Burnett CI 970), Petras (1970), Davies (1971), Mabry (1 <,)73), Ciria (1 <,)74), Chalmers (1974-7:1), North (1975), and Wellhofer CI 97:1).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Political Participation in Latin America: Levels, Structure, Context, Concentration and Rationality

Booth

1979

Lat. American Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite calls to improve and systematize research on political participation in Latin America more than a decade ago (Kling 1964, Flores Olea 1967), the burgeoning literature on the subject has yet to achieve full recognition. Thus certain contradictory and incomplete traditional images still linger in the scholarly literature (Booth and Seligson 1978a). These treatments vary dramatically and almost bewilderingly: while one suggests that Latin Americans are becoming increasingly politically mobilized, two others hold that mass participation is very low and that most political activity is restricted to socioeconomic elites. Other images portray mass political participation as irrational and dwell upon political violence. Such familiar notions have often intertwined. For example, a common picture depicts most Latin Americans, and especially peasants, as politically passive and quiescent until provoked, when they may burst violently into the political arena (for example, see Forman 1971, Singelmann 1975, Handelman 1975b, Moreno 1970). Similarly Wiarda (1974, pp. 4–5) discusses how the image of mobilization often combines with that of violence, producing the notion that the rising political awareness and participation of Latin Americans leads inexorably to ever greater levels of conflict (e.g., Schmitt and Burks 1963, Hadley 1958, Petras and Zeitlin 1968, Petras 1968).

show abstract

“…Manual Gonzalez Prada is considered the founder of Peruvian indigenismo, which is defined as the incorporation of indigenous peoples into civil society while preserving their culture (Davies 1971 Popular Revolution in America (APRA) as a strategy "that could coalesce general dissatisfaction among several social groups throughout Latin America" (Hunefeldt 2004, 193). Four years later, Mariátegui founded the Peruvian Socialist Party (PSP), envisioning a long-term strategy of consciousness building and the organized assembly of all exploited classes (Hunefeldt 2004, 212 (Hunefeldt 2004, 218).…”

Section: The Republic Of Peru-seeds Of Revolution (1826 -1960)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Landscape and collective memory in post-conflict Ayacucho, Peru: Narratives and photography of survivors.

Walker¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Indigenismo of the Peruvian Aprista Party: A Reinterpretation

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

The Peruvian Aprista Party and Haya de la Torre

The Peruvian Aprista Party and Haya de la Torre

Political Participation in Latin America: Levels, Structure, Context, Concentration and Rationality

Landscape and collective memory in post-conflict Ayacucho, Peru: Narratives and photography of survivors.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About