2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The indicator side of ecosystem services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
133
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
133
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The explicit link between ecosystems and people is a strong point of our approach, but also a weakness compared to approaches based on purely ecological indicators, because adding demand indicators increases the normative loading of the set of indicators (Müller & Burkhard 2012). This weakness applies to local ES, for which demand was assessed.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explicit link between ecosystems and people is a strong point of our approach, but also a weakness compared to approaches based on purely ecological indicators, because adding demand indicators increases the normative loading of the set of indicators (Müller & Burkhard 2012). This weakness applies to local ES, for which demand was assessed.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, ecosystem structures and processes determine the state of the system, which depends on ecological integrity (Müller & Burkhard, 2012). The concept of integrity refers to the selforganizing capacity of the system (Müller & Burkhard, 2012) and includes several structural and functional variables to determine the status of the ecosystem (Burkhard et al, 2012b;Kandziora et al, 2013;Müller et al, 2010a). Thus, special attention needs to be devoted to the issue of long-term ecosystem integrity, as it could be used to differentiate between services provided by ecosystems and other manmade systems (Currie, 2011).…”
Section: Key Issues • Is It Feasible and Useful To Consider Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize ecosystem performance not only ecosystem services, but also the ecosystem state should be considered (Müller et al, 2010b). In this regard, ecosystem structures and processes determine the state of the system, which depends on ecological integrity (Müller & Burkhard, 2012). The concept of integrity refers to the selforganizing capacity of the system (Müller & Burkhard, 2012) and includes several structural and functional variables to determine the status of the ecosystem (Burkhard et al, 2012b;Kandziora et al, 2013;Müller et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Key Issues • Is It Feasible and Useful To Consider Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os problemas na pesca e aquicultura dos países em desenvolvimento, geralmente estão associados à falta de organização e estrutura, ausência de dados dos recursos explotados, polí cas e gestão inadequadas (ELER; MILLANI, 2007;FAO, 2013), em que a complexidade dos elementos, associada às relações de causa e efeito, geralmente disponibilizam alguma ordem nas estruturas desse complicado sistema (MULLER; BURKHARD, 2012). No Brasil, várias ações procuram assegurar a sustentabilidade do setor, como um rígido controle dos aparelhos e permissões de pesca, período de defeso, limite do tamanho dos exemplares capturados, criação de reservas marinhas, mecanismos de escape da fauna acompanhante (FRANCO et al, 2009).…”
unclassified