2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3670425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Indian Law Bombshell: McGirt v. Oklahoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the federal government offered land in Indian Territory to tribes in perpetuity, allotment policies and treaties enacted in the late 1800s subsequently removed the majority of the land from tribes [ 48 ]. Then when the state of Oklahoma was established, it illegally extended jurisdiction over the tribal nations in the state [ 49 ]. As a result, non-Indian settlement—as well as dam building—was more widespread on OTSA land than on reservations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the federal government offered land in Indian Territory to tribes in perpetuity, allotment policies and treaties enacted in the late 1800s subsequently removed the majority of the land from tribes [ 48 ]. Then when the state of Oklahoma was established, it illegally extended jurisdiction over the tribal nations in the state [ 49 ]. As a result, non-Indian settlement—as well as dam building—was more widespread on OTSA land than on reservations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%