2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04197-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The increased sensitivity of qPCR in comparison to Kato-Katz is required for the accurate assessment of the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infection in settings that have received multiple rounds of mass drug administration

Abstract: Background: The most commonly used diagnostic tool for soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is the Kato-Katz (KK) thick smear technique. However, numerous studies have suggested that the sensitivity of KK can be problematic, especially in low prevalence and low intensity settings. An emerging alternative is quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Methods: In this study, both KK and qPCR were conducted on stool samples from 648 participants in an STH epidemiology study conducted in the delta region of Myanma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that qPCR results indicate higher sensitivity for all species across all examination days compared to Kato-Katz, which substantiates previous findings [17,27,30,34,[44][45][46]. Interestingly, follow-up Kato-Katz results differ significantly compared to the baseline results in the case of A. lumbricoides, indicating a time-dependent difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We found that qPCR results indicate higher sensitivity for all species across all examination days compared to Kato-Katz, which substantiates previous findings [17,27,30,34,[44][45][46]. Interestingly, follow-up Kato-Katz results differ significantly compared to the baseline results in the case of A. lumbricoides, indicating a time-dependent difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is the case of people living in communities that have received multiple treatments within MDA, during post-MDA surveillance, or when large worm burden in the host results in a decreased production of eggs. [41] , [42] , [43] Therefore, qPCR should be used instead of conventional coproscopic techniques to better estimate the distribution and intensity of STH infections in endemic areas and to monitor the effectiveness of deworming programs. This holds true for hookworms, but not for other STHs, for the tendency of their eggs to collapse and disappear when using conventional techniques, such as the Kato Katz thick smear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has some limitation. Although we used Kato-Katz, the most widely used diagnostic method recommended by WHO for epidemiologic surveys and anthelminthic drug efficacy studies against schistosomiasis and STH [ 37 , 39 ], its sensitivity decreases in low prevalence and low-intensity settings [ 40 ]. Low sensitivity of Kato-Katz for detection of hookworm infection may be related to rapid degeneration of delicate hookworm eggs with time [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%