2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1049581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incorporation Choices of Privately Held Corporations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, Dammann and Schündeln () show that the vast majority (93%) of private companies incorporate in the state where the main place of business is located; of the rest, 3.8 percent incorporate in Delaware. Consistent with the results by Dammann and Schündeln (), only three companies in our sample are incorporated in Delaware. Moreover, even when Delaware‐incorporated companies are excluded from our analyses, the results stay robust (analyses available upon request).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, Dammann and Schündeln () show that the vast majority (93%) of private companies incorporate in the state where the main place of business is located; of the rest, 3.8 percent incorporate in Delaware. Consistent with the results by Dammann and Schündeln (), only three companies in our sample are incorporated in Delaware. Moreover, even when Delaware‐incorporated companies are excluded from our analyses, the results stay robust (analyses available upon request).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Just as it is for large firms, the top jurisdiction of choice for privately held corporations and LLCs is Delaware. 45 Panama, which appears to be extremely restrictive. 49 But this may neither be the best reading of the Restatement, which might be understood differently when taking into account the broader context of this provision, nor the best policy.…”
Section: The Internal Affairs Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…165 Es kann als solches kaum Geltung für das Recht der geschlossenen Kapitalgesellschaften beanspruchen, da das Problem der »starken Manager und schwachen Gesellschafter« (strong managers and weak owners) hier nur selten existiert. 166 Unabhängig davon, inwieweit es im Übrigen zutrifft, kann es jedenfalls keinen Einwand gegen das hier vertretene Konzept eines marktimitierenden lars klöhn RabelsZ Schwerpunktheft: Optionales europäisches Privatrecht Rechtsformangebots begründen. Denn diesem Konzept geht es nicht darum, den horizontalen Wettbewerb möglichst so nachzuahmen, wie er in der Realität ablaufen würde, sondern zu simulieren, welches Resultat ein funktionierender Regulierungswettbewerb zutage fördern würde.…”
Section: Rechtsvereinheitlichungunclassified