2001
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.116369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory: A revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…19,32,43,52,80,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] The lead authors of these studies were contacted by letter and asked to provide further information. Four authors responded with all of the requested data.…”
Section: Results Of Contacting Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…19,32,43,52,80,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] The lead authors of these studies were contacted by letter and asked to provide further information. Four authors responded with all of the requested data.…”
Section: Results Of Contacting Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…107,113,114 Attempts to contact the authors resulted in one response with the full data requested. 107 One study investigated the association between the UDI and IIQ long form with a 1-hour pad test.…”
Section: Validated Scale Compared With Pad Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This emphasizes the idea that there should be a patient self-assessment in chronic diseases. Many works have shown that there are little correlations between the resounding of urinary incontinence in the daily life of a patient and the symptomatic, clinical and paraclinical evaluations used to evaluate urinary disorders (voiding diary, pad test, scale of symptoms, urodynamic parameters) [6] Nevertheless, these measures don't reflect the resounding lived by the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%