Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting 2019
DOI: 10.3102/1435842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incongruent Racial Grammar of Teacher Education: A Critical Race Theory Study of Black and Latina Preservice Teachers

Abstract: Current research has turned a gaze towards teacher education programs' desire to recruit students of color. Yet very little has been done to deconstruct the intersectional racial structure and grammar of teacher education in order to provide meaningful learning experiences for preservice teachers of color (PSTOC) who often endeavor to teach in the very underserved communities of color that educator preparation programs fetishize. Moreover, we do not know much about the first-generation preservice teachers of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second and concurrent to what we saw in the legal field, CRT also ushered in a significant turn from implied race vis-à-vis colorblind multiculturalism towards an explicit naming of race, racism, and racialized citizenship in social studies scholarship (Howard, 2004; Marshall et al, 2016; Navarro & Howard, 2017; Tyson, 2003). Following the collective call to apply a CRT lens to social studies curriculum, professional spaces, policy, and research, social studies education scholars began to move away from the multicultural paradigm and instead foreground critical theories and frameworks explicitly centered on race (Busey, in press). In addition to CRT, scholars also draw from Black feminist thought, postcolonial thought, queer theory and sexuality studies, and critical whiteness studies (Hawkman & Shear, 2020; Mayo, 2013; Sabzalian, 2019; Crowley & Smith, 2015; Vickery, 2015, 2016, 2017; Woodson, 2017a).…”
Section: The Need For An Appraisal Of Crt In Social Studies Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second and concurrent to what we saw in the legal field, CRT also ushered in a significant turn from implied race vis-à-vis colorblind multiculturalism towards an explicit naming of race, racism, and racialized citizenship in social studies scholarship (Howard, 2004; Marshall et al, 2016; Navarro & Howard, 2017; Tyson, 2003). Following the collective call to apply a CRT lens to social studies curriculum, professional spaces, policy, and research, social studies education scholars began to move away from the multicultural paradigm and instead foreground critical theories and frameworks explicitly centered on race (Busey, in press). In addition to CRT, scholars also draw from Black feminist thought, postcolonial thought, queer theory and sexuality studies, and critical whiteness studies (Hawkman & Shear, 2020; Mayo, 2013; Sabzalian, 2019; Crowley & Smith, 2015; Vickery, 2015, 2016, 2017; Woodson, 2017a).…”
Section: The Need For An Appraisal Of Crt In Social Studies Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%