1959
DOI: 10.1056/nejm195904022601403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incompetent Cervix in Repetitive Abortion and Premature Labor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition, defined as cervical incompetence (CI), is often characterized by a positive anamnesis for recurrent abortion in the second trimester or PTD at the beginning of the third trimester, subsequent to asymptomatic dilation of the cervix with prolapse of lower pole of the gestational sac into the vagina, even in the absence of an appreciable myometrial contractile activity [1]. In these cases, the prognosis for the fetus is in most cases unfavorable, and therefore is strongly indicated every possible attempt to prolong the pregnancy as much as possible [2]. In 1948, Palmer and La Comme [3] provided an extensive description of this condition, and in the following years several surgical techniques were developed for its treatment either with vaginal approach [4, 5], and, in special in particular cases, also with transabdominal one [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This condition, defined as cervical incompetence (CI), is often characterized by a positive anamnesis for recurrent abortion in the second trimester or PTD at the beginning of the third trimester, subsequent to asymptomatic dilation of the cervix with prolapse of lower pole of the gestational sac into the vagina, even in the absence of an appreciable myometrial contractile activity [1]. In these cases, the prognosis for the fetus is in most cases unfavorable, and therefore is strongly indicated every possible attempt to prolong the pregnancy as much as possible [2]. In 1948, Palmer and La Comme [3] provided an extensive description of this condition, and in the following years several surgical techniques were developed for its treatment either with vaginal approach [4, 5], and, in special in particular cases, also with transabdominal one [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are no statistically significant differences between vaginal cerclage performed with the Shirodkar or McDonald technique, it has been suggested that the four steps technique can be considered the most valid method. In fact, it is believed that the few but deep passages of the tape in the thickness of the cervical tissue can result in better grip and seal, and, therefore, have a lower tendency to dislocation, a greater resistance to dilation and a reduced risk of lacerations of the cervix in the case of myometrial contractile activity [2, 15]. In the current study, we used a combination of the Shirodkar and McDonald’s ones that in our opinion is faster and simpler to perform and holds better respect to other surgical procedures of cervical cerclage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic cervical insufficiency is a diagnosis, based on an obstetric history of recurrent second- or early third-trimester fetal loss, following painless cervical dilatation, prolapse or rupture of the membranes, and expulsion of a live fetus despite minimal uterine activity [1]. In the absence of the classic recurrence, the term cervical insufficiency is generally used as a work-diagnosis based on a single event with the same characteristic clinical history after exclusion of other possible causes of preterm delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The diagnosis is usually made in retrospect, based on the clinical history and after exclusion of possible causes of preterm uterine activity. Previous reports suggest that about 1% of all pregnant women and 8% of women who suffered second or early third-trimester losses could be affected.…”
Section: 5005/jp-journals-10016-1052mentioning
confidence: 99%