Abstract:Field triage guidelines recommend transport of head-injured patients on anticoagulants or antiplatelets to a higher-level trauma center based on studies suggesting a high incidence of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH). We compared the incidence of tICH in older adults transported by EMS with and without anticoagulation or antiplatelet use and evaluated the accuracies of different sets of field triage criteria to identify tICH. This was a prospective, observational study at 5 EMS agencies and 11 hospital… Show more
“…7 Prior studies have also shown that current field triage guidelines are not accurate in predicting trauma center need in this population. [8][9][10]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older adults with head injury often have minor mechanisms of injury, such as falls from standing height, yet have significant traumatic intracranial hemorrhage . Prior studies have also shown that current field triage guidelines are not accurate in predicting trauma center need in this population …”
Objective
It is unclear whether trauma center care is associated with improved outcomes in older adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to management at nontrauma centers. Our primary objectives were to describe the long‐term outcomes of older adults with TBI and to evaluate the association of trauma center transport with long‐term functional outcome.
Methods
This was a prospective, observational study at five emergency medical services (EMS) agencies and 11 hospitals representing all 9‐1‐1 transfers within a county. Older adults (≥55 years) with TBI (defined as closed head injury associated with loss of consciousness and/or amnesia, abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage) and transported by EMS from August 2015 to September 2016 were eligible. EMS providers completed standardized data forms and emergency department (ED) and hospital data were abstracted. Functional outcomes were measured using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS‐E) at 3‐ and 6‐month intervals by telephone follow‐up. Reasons for disabilities were coded as due to head injury, due to illness or injury to other part of body, or due to a mixture of both. To evaluate the association of trauma center transport and functional outcomes, we conducted multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses on multiple imputed data for 1) all patients with TBI and 2) patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Results
We enrolled 350 patients with TBI; the median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 84) years, 187 (53%) were male, and 91 patients (26%) had traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial ED cranial computed tomography (CT) imaging. A total of 257 patients (73%) were transported by EMS to a Level I or II trauma center. Sixty‐nine patients (20%) did not complete follow‐up at 3 or 6 months. Of the patients with follow‐up, 119 of 260 patients (46%) had moderate disability or worse at 6 months, including 55 of 260 patients (21%) who were dead at 6‐month follow‐up. Death or severe disabilities were more commonly attributed to non‐TBI causes while moderate disabilities or better were more commonly due to TBI. On adjusted analysis, an abnormal GCS score, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and the presence of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial ED cranial imaging were associated with worse GOS‐E scores at 6 months. Trauma center transport was not associated with GOS‐E scores at 6 months for TBI patients and in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial ED CT imaging.
Conclusions
In older adults with TBI, moderate disability or worse is common 6 months after injury. Over one in five of older adults with TBI died by 6 months, usually due to nonhead causes. Patients with TBI or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage did not have improved functional outcomes with initial triage to a trauma center.
“…7 Prior studies have also shown that current field triage guidelines are not accurate in predicting trauma center need in this population. [8][9][10]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older adults with head injury often have minor mechanisms of injury, such as falls from standing height, yet have significant traumatic intracranial hemorrhage . Prior studies have also shown that current field triage guidelines are not accurate in predicting trauma center need in this population …”
Objective
It is unclear whether trauma center care is associated with improved outcomes in older adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to management at nontrauma centers. Our primary objectives were to describe the long‐term outcomes of older adults with TBI and to evaluate the association of trauma center transport with long‐term functional outcome.
Methods
This was a prospective, observational study at five emergency medical services (EMS) agencies and 11 hospitals representing all 9‐1‐1 transfers within a county. Older adults (≥55 years) with TBI (defined as closed head injury associated with loss of consciousness and/or amnesia, abnormal Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage) and transported by EMS from August 2015 to September 2016 were eligible. EMS providers completed standardized data forms and emergency department (ED) and hospital data were abstracted. Functional outcomes were measured using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS‐E) at 3‐ and 6‐month intervals by telephone follow‐up. Reasons for disabilities were coded as due to head injury, due to illness or injury to other part of body, or due to a mixture of both. To evaluate the association of trauma center transport and functional outcomes, we conducted multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses on multiple imputed data for 1) all patients with TBI and 2) patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Results
We enrolled 350 patients with TBI; the median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 84) years, 187 (53%) were male, and 91 patients (26%) had traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial ED cranial computed tomography (CT) imaging. A total of 257 patients (73%) were transported by EMS to a Level I or II trauma center. Sixty‐nine patients (20%) did not complete follow‐up at 3 or 6 months. Of the patients with follow‐up, 119 of 260 patients (46%) had moderate disability or worse at 6 months, including 55 of 260 patients (21%) who were dead at 6‐month follow‐up. Death or severe disabilities were more commonly attributed to non‐TBI causes while moderate disabilities or better were more commonly due to TBI. On adjusted analysis, an abnormal GCS score, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and the presence of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial ED cranial imaging were associated with worse GOS‐E scores at 6 months. Trauma center transport was not associated with GOS‐E scores at 6 months for TBI patients and in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial ED CT imaging.
Conclusions
In older adults with TBI, moderate disability or worse is common 6 months after injury. Over one in five of older adults with TBI died by 6 months, usually due to nonhead causes. Patients with TBI or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage did not have improved functional outcomes with initial triage to a trauma center.
“…To date, specific recommendations are missing for low‐energy trauma in older patients such as ground‐level falls with or without anticoagulation or antiplatelet treatments and equivocal clinical signs of traumatic brain injury. Current studies on these particular patients are heterogeneous and bear some limitations, such as missing control group, small sample sizes, or lacking information about injury severity …”
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and severity of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) in a large cohort of older adults presenting with lowenergy falls and the association with anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication. DESIGN: Bicentric retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Two level 1 trauma centers in Switzerland and Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of older adults (aged ≥65 y) presenting to the emergency department (ED) over a 1-year period with low-energy falls who received cranial computed tomography (cCT) within 48 hours of ED presentation. MEASUREMENTS: The prevalence and severity of tICHs was assessed and the outcomes (in-hospital mortality, admission to intensive care unit [ICU], or neurosurgical intervention) were specified. We used multivariate regression models to measure the association between anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy and the risk for tICH after adjustment for known predictors. RESULTS: The overall prevalence for tICH detected by cCT was 176 of 2567 (6.9%). Neurosurgical intervention was performed in 15 of 176 (8.5%) patients with tICH, 28 of 176 (15.9%) patients were admitted to the ICU, and 14 of 176 (8.0%) died in the hospital. CT-detected skull fracture and signs of injury above the clavicles were the strongest predictors for the presence of tICH (odds ratio [OR] = 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.79-6.51; OR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.3-2.73, respectively). Among 2567 included patients, 1424 (55%) were on anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy. Multivariate regression models showed no differences for the risk of tICH (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = .76-1.47; P = .76) or association with the head-specific Injury Severity Scale (incident rate ratio = 1.08; 95% CI = .97-1.19; P = .15) with or without anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSION: Medication with anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents was not associated with higher prevalence and severity of tICH in older patients with low-energy falls undergoing cCT examination. In addition to cCT-detected skull fractures, visible injuries above the clavicles were the strongest clinical predictors for tICH. Our findings merit prospective validation. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:977-982, 2020.
“…The vast majority were ground level falls. Previous research has reported a 2.3% rate of ICH in low‐risk head injury patients (Glasgow Coma Scale of 15, no neurologic findings, no visible wounds, and no coagulation diseases or medications) and 11% in hospitalized head trauma patients …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some studies suggest that the incidence of ICH is more common and outcomes are worse when they occur in patients on anticoagulation . Others report that the incidence of ICH with anticoagulation is unchanged . These studies, in general, are limited as most are retrospective, have relatively low numbers of subjects, or have other methodologic limitations.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.