2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02397-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incidence of non-affective psychotic disorders in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Purpose Global understanding of the epidemiological landscape of non-affective psychotic disorders (NAPD) is predominantly based on studies from high-income countries. We sought to systematically review and meta-analyse all incidence studies conducted in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods We systematically searched four databases using terms for NAPD, incidence and LMICs. Citations were eligible for inclusion if: published between 1 January 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mapping of evidence according to the type of review and mental disorder () shows that population-level prevalence estimates are generally lacking beyond CMDs, including for schizophrenia and psychotic disorders, behavioural syndromes, personality disorders, and intellectual disabilities. These identified gaps are supported by other recent reviews (Russell et al, 2022; Bastien et al, 2023), and should be a focus of future research, along with the strengthening of epidemiological surveillance systems to better capture morbidity, mortality, and economic burden of all mental disorders and intentional self-harm in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The mapping of evidence according to the type of review and mental disorder () shows that population-level prevalence estimates are generally lacking beyond CMDs, including for schizophrenia and psychotic disorders, behavioural syndromes, personality disorders, and intellectual disabilities. These identified gaps are supported by other recent reviews (Russell et al, 2022; Bastien et al, 2023), and should be a focus of future research, along with the strengthening of epidemiological surveillance systems to better capture morbidity, mortality, and economic burden of all mental disorders and intentional self-harm in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In LMIC settings, the reasons for this may be self‐evident, since limited resources may mean political prioritization of other vital issues. Recent reviews have highlighted the evidence gap in incidence and prevalence estimates of psychiatric disorders between HIC and LMIC settings 462 . In HIC settings, the lack of routine data on psychiatric morbidity in the population is sometimes surprising.…”
Section: Recommendations For Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite two-to-threefold variation in incidence rates across study centres, the results have long been interpreted as evidence that psychotic disorders are similarly prevalent in different parts of the world (McGrath, 2005). This interpretation has subsequently been challenged by systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and new multisite studies (Bastien et al, 2023;Jongsma et al, 2018;McGrath et al, 2004). The variations in incidence may provide clues to the aetiology of psychotic disorders, particularly the types of environments that increase or differentiate the risk for the disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variations in incidence may provide clues to the aetiology of psychotic disorders, particularly the types of environments that increase or differentiate the risk for the disorder. In the meta-analysis of rates from low-and middle-income countries, estimates were based on very limited settings, highlighting the need for new studies in non-Western countries (Bastien et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%