2009
DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.6.522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incidence and Clinical Implications of Congenital Defects of Atlantal Arch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A CT scan is helpful in evaluating the integrity of the atlas and differentiating an acute injury from a developmental cleft. 3 It is unclear as to whether this is a hereditary defect, although two reports have documented the existence of cases involving a mother and son. 1,4 The incidence between genders is similar and the clinical presentation is variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CT scan is helpful in evaluating the integrity of the atlas and differentiating an acute injury from a developmental cleft. 3 It is unclear as to whether this is a hereditary defect, although two reports have documented the existence of cases involving a mother and son. 1,4 The incidence between genders is similar and the clinical presentation is variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern clinical studies type A defect was seen with an incidence of 2.6% [17] to 3.2% [7]. Posterior arch defects are attrib-uted to the defective or absent development of the cartilaginous preformation of the arch rather than a disturbance of the ossification [11]. Congenital posterior arch defects are generally asymptomatic and are considered benign anatomical variations; however, as in asymptomatic individuals they may become dangerous in the context of trauma, it is important to distinguish between a bony injury and a congenital anomaly [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicated that the finding was not acutely caused by recent trauma. Lateral flexion/extension plain radiographs of the cervical roughly 4% of patients present with congenital posterior arch defects, with the predominant (97%) type being Type A [1,4,5]. Type B through Type E congenital defects have been reported to occur in 0.69% of the population [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A secondary center of ossification center which is the center for the posterior tubercle, may be present in about 2% of cases. Failure in any step of this complex process leads to abnormalities [1,3,4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation