1999
DOI: 10.1006/fmic.1999.0278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incidence and antibiotic resistance profiles of Salmonella spp. on Irish retail meat products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of Salmonella contamination in retail meat samples above 60% is significantly higher than that reported for other countries (16,19,21,25,27,45,58,61). The antibiotic resistance susceptibility results also indicated alarming multiresistance frequencies for Salmonella and E. coli isolates from food, where multiresistance rates of 20.9% for Salmonella isolates and 61.6% for E. coli isolates were detected and most probably reflect the unregulated use of antibiotics in food-producing animals in the country (60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The rate of Salmonella contamination in retail meat samples above 60% is significantly higher than that reported for other countries (16,19,21,25,27,45,58,61). The antibiotic resistance susceptibility results also indicated alarming multiresistance frequencies for Salmonella and E. coli isolates from food, where multiresistance rates of 20.9% for Salmonella isolates and 61.6% for E. coli isolates were detected and most probably reflect the unregulated use of antibiotics in food-producing animals in the country (60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Another study found the predominant serotype to be S. typhimurium var Copenhagen (Sorensen et al, 2002). Other studies have reported the predominant serotype to be S. enteritidis (Domínguezet al, 2002;Mayrhofer et, 2004), S. bredeney (Duffy et al, 1999) and S. anatum (Mrema et al, 2006). The different results may reflect the different meat types examined (meat cuts vs ground meat) or different geographic locations of sampling.…”
Section: Salmonella From Meatsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Positive samples were 10 (12.5%) and S. enteritidis was the most frequent strain (3/9). However, Duffy et al, 1999 [16] , in Ireland, tested 106 poultry meat samples during the latest 3 months of 1996 and found 28 positive samples with 6 different Salmonella serotypes in which S. bredeney was the most prevalent (48.4%).…”
Section: Incidences Of Poultry Meat Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%