2001
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200108000-00044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The In Vivo Effects of General and Epidural Anesthesia on Human Immune Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although NUC rates were low for the three study groups combined (4.6%), there was a statistically significant increase in NUC rates as operative time increased, with odds ratios of 1.9 and 4.8 for groups II and III vs group I. Anaesthetic agents are known to have an effect on the immune system [5]. This might affect infectious complications and, theoretically at least, increase the likelihood of tumour spread [6]. Thus, increased anaesthesia time could result in an increased immunological suppression, leading to an increase in some complications seen in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although NUC rates were low for the three study groups combined (4.6%), there was a statistically significant increase in NUC rates as operative time increased, with odds ratios of 1.9 and 4.8 for groups II and III vs group I. Anaesthetic agents are known to have an effect on the immune system [5]. This might affect infectious complications and, theoretically at least, increase the likelihood of tumour spread [6]. Thus, increased anaesthesia time could result in an increased immunological suppression, leading to an increase in some complications seen in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5 In contrast, propofol is variously reported to be inhibitory, 6 have little effect, 7 or even enhance immune function. 8 Opioid analgesics inhibit both cellular and humoral immune function in humans.…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional anesthesia is believed to be beneficial against cancer recurrence due to reduced exposure to immunosuppressive agents (i.e., nitrous oxide), reduced surgical stress and adrenergic stimulation, but the mechanism is still unclear [147]. In fact, in absence of surgical stress, both general and local anesthesia have minor and transient effects on immune function [151].…”
Section: Does the Type Of Anesthesia Influence The Risk Of Cancer Recmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional anesthesia is believed to be beneficial against cancer recurrence due to reduced exposure to immunosuppressive agents (i.e., nitrous oxide), reduced surgical stress and adrenergic stimulation, but the mechanism is still unclear [147]. In fact, in absence of surgical stress, both general and local anesthesia have minor and transient effects on immune function [151].On the other hand, cancer proliferation involves several stimuli and mediators, which can be all affected by the anesthetics [147,152].NK cells activity was investigated in patients undergoing laparotomy colectomy under either general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia alone [145]. Patients receiving general anesthesia had a significant reduction of NK cells activity (36% vs. 22%, p=0.02) respect to preoperative values, whereas the epidural group did not shown significant changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%