1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7799(98)01250-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The in vivo delivery of heterologous proteins by microencapsulated recombinant cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although decreasing the solid stress induced by the surrounding gel may prolong the therapeutic functional period of cell-enclosing capsules as a result of cell growth within them, escape of cells into the surrounding environment is not optimal, from a safety point of view. In the case of transplanting a proliferative cell line in vivo, suppressing an excess proliferation of enclosed cells is vital for avoiding the risk of tumorigenesis (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although decreasing the solid stress induced by the surrounding gel may prolong the therapeutic functional period of cell-enclosing capsules as a result of cell growth within them, escape of cells into the surrounding environment is not optimal, from a safety point of view. In the case of transplanting a proliferative cell line in vivo, suppressing an excess proliferation of enclosed cells is vital for avoiding the risk of tumorigenesis (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enclosing these cells in imunoprotective devices would allow such nonautologous Time cells to be implanted into any host to deliver the desired gene product without triggering graft rejection. The advantages of this nonautologous method of gene delivery are: it does not require modification of the host's genome, thus providing additional measures of safety and cost saving; it provides ample material for quality assessment before implantation, a safety feature not available to most other forms of in vivo delivery (Chang et al, 1999;Tai and Sun, 1993). Read et al(2001) described a technique for the treatment of malignant brain tumors based on local delivery of endostatin from genetically engineered cells encapsulated in sodium alginate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49] Drugs can be injected directly (bolus or infusion) via intrathecal catheters, by controlled release matrices 50 , microencapsulated chemicals 51 or recombinant cells 52 . The major problem with bolus injection is slower movement of compounds within the brain due to the limited diffusion coefficient.…”
Section: Intracerebral (Intraparenchymal) Drug Delivery To the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%