2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The In-Hospital Cost of Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Implications for Patient Selection

Abstract: Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used in critically ill patients to provide cardiac and/or respiratory support. Despite improvement in technology, experience, and management, the survival rate remains low. In the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry only 43% of adult ECMO patients survived to discharge, though readmission rates and reasons for readmission are not captured. These data are valuable to determine discharge planning and education for ECMO patients. This stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected 21 days for our analysis as several studies have noted the median implant LOS to be 20 to 21 days . The need to focus on VAD implant LOS is underscored by the close relationship between LOS and total hospital cost, demonstrated across conditions and more recently determined to be the main driver of costs during the implant hospitalization with implant LOS explaining 77% of the cost variance at one center . Improving cost effectiveness of this life‐saving therapy will require continued refinement, not only in outpatient management, but also patient selection and identifying higher risk features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected 21 days for our analysis as several studies have noted the median implant LOS to be 20 to 21 days . The need to focus on VAD implant LOS is underscored by the close relationship between LOS and total hospital cost, demonstrated across conditions and more recently determined to be the main driver of costs during the implant hospitalization with implant LOS explaining 77% of the cost variance at one center . Improving cost effectiveness of this life‐saving therapy will require continued refinement, not only in outpatient management, but also patient selection and identifying higher risk features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] The need to focus on VAD implant LOS is underscored by the close relationship between LOS and total hospital cost, demonstrated across conditions 20 and more recently determined to be the main driver of costs during the implant hospitalization with implant LOS explaining 77% of the cost variance at one center. 21 Improving cost effectiveness of this life-saving therapy will require continued refinement, not only in outpatient management, but also patient selection and identifying higher risk features. While this has traditionally centered on assessing the risk of mortality and right ventricular failure, expanding this risk assessment beyond traditional medical parameters, while challenging, may be of great utility in identifying novel variables that may serve as potential targets for quality improvement and cost containment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%