Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1959
1959
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That innovation was often highly theoretical-as in Witkin and Goodenough's (1981) work on cognitive styles, Sigel's (1990) distancing theory, Lord and Novick's (1968) seminal volume on IRT, Messick's (1989) unified conception of validity, Mislevy's (1994Mislevy's ( , 1996 early work on ECD, Deane et al's (2015) English language arts competency model, and Sykes and Wilson's (2015) conceptions of teaching practice. But that innovation was also very often practical-witness the in-basket test (Frederiksen et al 1957), LISREL (Jöreskog and van Thillo 1972), the EM algorithm (Dempster et al 1977), Lord's (1980) "Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems," the application of Mantel-Haenszel to DIF (Holland and Thayer 1988), the plausiblevalues solution to the estimation of population performance in sample surveys (Mislevy et al 1992a), and e-rater (Burstein et al 1998). These innovations were not only useful but used, in all the preceding cases widely employed in the measurement community, and in some cases used throughout the sciences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That innovation was often highly theoretical-as in Witkin and Goodenough's (1981) work on cognitive styles, Sigel's (1990) distancing theory, Lord and Novick's (1968) seminal volume on IRT, Messick's (1989) unified conception of validity, Mislevy's (1994Mislevy's ( , 1996 early work on ECD, Deane et al's (2015) English language arts competency model, and Sykes and Wilson's (2015) conceptions of teaching practice. But that innovation was also very often practical-witness the in-basket test (Frederiksen et al 1957), LISREL (Jöreskog and van Thillo 1972), the EM algorithm (Dempster et al 1977), Lord's (1980) "Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems," the application of Mantel-Haenszel to DIF (Holland and Thayer 1988), the plausiblevalues solution to the estimation of population performance in sample surveys (Mislevy et al 1992a), and e-rater (Burstein et al 1998). These innovations were not only useful but used, in all the preceding cases widely employed in the measurement community, and in some cases used throughout the sciences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty percent of the subjects held positions as chief executive officer, president, vice-president, or other manager, while 40 percent were classified as professional staff(such as accountants or consultants), analysts, or supervisors. Frederiksen, Saunders, and Wand (1957) introduced the in-basket format for management research, and it was first used to study risk by MacCrimmon and Wehrung (1984). The principal characteristics of a risk in-basket are: (1) it provides a business context in which a participant is asked to play a fictional role; (2) the decision situations are developed around a standard two-action risk paradigm in which all actions, consequences, and probabilities are well specified; and (3) various response modes are used to uncover a wide variety of risk-handling activities to provide alternative means for the participants to reveal how they would deal with a risky situation.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception to this trend was the AP program, which relied on constructed-response tasks from its inception. There was also pioneering work on constructed-response assessments early in ETS's history (Frederiksen et al 1957;Hemphill et al 1962). However, in both of these cases, the context was very different from the admissions testing case that represented the bulk of ETS business.…”
Section: Summary and Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the earliest instance of this latter line of work is the "in-basket test" developed by Frederiksen et al (1957). Essentially, the in-basket format is used to simulate an office environment where the test taker plays the role of school principal or business executive, for example.…”
Section: Professional Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%