2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2897588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impulse Response of Negatively Focused Spherical Ultrasound Detectors and Its Effect on Tomographic Optoacoustic Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This compensation was achieved by experimentally measuring the spatial transfer function and applying it as a multiplicative weighting function in the frequency domain inversion scheme of the acquired RSOM data. Although incorporating the PSF has been shown to successfully improve the quality of reconstructed optoacoustic images 30,46,47 and detector sensitivity fields have been included in reconstruction algorithms to account for negatively focused ultrasound transducers 48,49 , these studies were performed in the time-domain and suffered from long processing times. Here we incorporate the PSF correction factor in the reconstruction problem in the Fourier domain to avoid sacrificing computational time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compensation was achieved by experimentally measuring the spatial transfer function and applying it as a multiplicative weighting function in the frequency domain inversion scheme of the acquired RSOM data. Although incorporating the PSF has been shown to successfully improve the quality of reconstructed optoacoustic images 30,46,47 and detector sensitivity fields have been included in reconstruction algorithms to account for negatively focused ultrasound transducers 48,49 , these studies were performed in the time-domain and suffered from long processing times. Here we incorporate the PSF correction factor in the reconstruction problem in the Fourier domain to avoid sacrificing computational time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a joint optimization approach can solve this issue. 36,37 The measured EIR is refined with a variable projection method to recover the optical deposition by exploiting the bi-linearity of the imaging model. 32,33 This approach enables low-cost and adequate compensation for the model mismatch.…”
Section: Model-based Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, various methods for numerically compensating for the transducer effects in image reconstruction algorithms were explored. 12,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] These methods are generally computationally burdensome because of their nature of iterative least-squares minimization. However, incorporating far-field approximation into the forward model can reduce the computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MB inversion in the time domain is arguably the most accurate approach to account for the finite size and shape of US sensors. [34,35,36] Additionally, the performance of iterative inversion can be enhanced by properly choosing constraints or regularization terms. [37,38,39,40,41,42] However, implementation of this method for the dense grid of voxels required for high-resolution volumetric imaging has remained challenging due to extremely high computational costs, even when considering efficient parallel implementations in graphics processing units (GPUs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%