1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(94)01248-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The improvement of the output performance of a low energy medical standing wave accelerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, an unloaded (no electron beam) accelerator must be over‐coupled in order to have optimal coupling when beam‐loaded (with an electron beam). The amount of over‐coupling required for optimal coupling of a beam‐loaded accelerator is a function of the beam current and energy, and must be determined empirically. However, because the waveguide simulations are completed in COMSOL and are separate from the electron beam simulations, it is impossible to accurately model the effects of beam loading on RF coupling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, an unloaded (no electron beam) accelerator must be over‐coupled in order to have optimal coupling when beam‐loaded (with an electron beam). The amount of over‐coupling required for optimal coupling of a beam‐loaded accelerator is a function of the beam current and energy, and must be determined empirically. However, because the waveguide simulations are completed in COMSOL and are separate from the electron beam simulations, it is impossible to accurately model the effects of beam loading on RF coupling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1995, H.B. Zhao et al published an equation for the optimal coupling coefficient in order to maximize the dose rate at a specific input power [27]:…”
Section: The Injection Portmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, n is the experimental value that is obtained for different output energies. According to the reference [27] for a 6 MeV tube, the value of n is 2.8, giving an optimal coupling coefficient of 2.11. This means S 11 should be −8.9 dB.…”
Section: The Injection Portmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth and last design stage is the design of a coupling port that feeds power from the magnetron, through the transmission waveguide into the linac waveguide. In 1995, Zhao et al 27 published a formula that determines the optimal coupling coefficient from a known input power with the goal of maximizing dose rate. With an input power of 2.3 MW, the optimal coupling coefficient was calculated to be 2.11.…”
Section: Fig 2 a Cutaway Section Of The Waveguide Terminated In Halmentioning
confidence: 99%