2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The improvement of gel and physicochemical properties of porcine myosin under low salt concentrations by pulsed ultrasound treatment and its mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
22
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
22
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increase of ultrasonic power, the α-helices of TUEP showed an increasing trend, which may be because the α-helices were maintained by the hydrogen bonds (formed by the carbonyl group and amino group of polypeptide chain) [42] , and the increased polarity of protein may affect the hydrogen bond of α-helices, thus increasing the content of α-helices. Interestingly, the results of the α-helices in this study were contrary to those of porcine myosin gel under ultrasonic treatment [32] , suggested that the effects of ultrasonic treatment may be different for different proteins.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the increase of ultrasonic power, the α-helices of TUEP showed an increasing trend, which may be because the α-helices were maintained by the hydrogen bonds (formed by the carbonyl group and amino group of polypeptide chain) [42] , and the increased polarity of protein may affect the hydrogen bond of α-helices, thus increasing the content of α-helices. Interestingly, the results of the α-helices in this study were contrary to those of porcine myosin gel under ultrasonic treatment [32] , suggested that the effects of ultrasonic treatment may be different for different proteins.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Surface hydrophobicity gradually increased with the increase of ultrasonic power, which indicated that the hydrophobic amino acid residues of protein were exposed to water environment by ultrasonic treatment. It may be because ultrasonic cavitation may generate strong shear force in the local protein sample, which would unfold of TUEP and UEP structure and expose the hydrophobic amino acid residues on protein surface [32] . The combination of polyphenols with protein (hydrophilic hydroxyl groups of polyphenols bind to lipophilic groups of protein) may promote protein aggregation, leading to the decrease of protein surface hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, ultrasound, combined with high temperatures, probably reduced the activity of endogenous proteases, with this having a negative effect on the gel properties [15] . Therefore, the hardness of the U + U group was slightly lower than that of U + W. In addition, the myofibrillar proteins could have been overextended after prolonged ultrasonic treatment, and this could have seriously impaired the conformation of the proteins, resulting in poor textural properties [31] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Meanwhile, we observed that the WHC of the U + U group was lower than that of the U + W group. This could have been because ultrasound treatment at high power and for long periods of time caused protein oxidation and degradation [33] , thereby disrupting its orderly aggregation and forming a non-uniform three-dimensional network structure of the surimi gels [31] . In turn, such a non-uniform structure could have weakened the ability to hold onto water molecules, resulting in a decline in water content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%