2001
DOI: 10.1007/s100520100654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The improved nuclear parton distributions

Abstract: In this paper we propose an improvement of the EKS nuclear parton distributions for the small x region of high energy processes, where the perturbative high parton density effects cannot be disregarded. We analyze the behavior of the ratios xG A /xG N and F A 2 /F D 2 and verify that at small x they are strongly modified when compared to the EKS predictions. The implications of our results for the heavy ion collisions in RHIC and LHC are discussed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But one should take into account that in DGLAP approaches the small x behaviour at Q 2 close to Q 2 0 comes mainly from the assumptions for the initial conditions. The model [107] gives results for R Pb F 2 at Q 2 = 2.25 GeV 2 very close to those of [99, 103] at x = 0.01 where the considered high-density corrections are almost negligible, but sizably smaller, R Pb F 2 0.43, at x = 10 −5 . These predictions could be checked in the EIC [24], where values of x ∼ 3 × 10 −4 at Q 2 ∼ 1 GeV 2 should become accessible, or in ultra-peripheral proton-ion or ion-ion collisions (UPC) [115,116].…”
Section: Comparison Among Different Modelssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…But one should take into account that in DGLAP approaches the small x behaviour at Q 2 close to Q 2 0 comes mainly from the assumptions for the initial conditions. The model [107] gives results for R Pb F 2 at Q 2 = 2.25 GeV 2 very close to those of [99, 103] at x = 0.01 where the considered high-density corrections are almost negligible, but sizably smaller, R Pb F 2 0.43, at x = 10 −5 . These predictions could be checked in the EIC [24], where values of x ∼ 3 × 10 −4 at Q 2 ∼ 1 GeV 2 should become accessible, or in ultra-peripheral proton-ion or ion-ion collisions (UPC) [115,116].…”
Section: Comparison Among Different Modelssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…15 and the mentioned discussion in Section 3; [120] gives R Pb g ∼ 0.7 at x = 0.01 and ∼ 0.2 at x = 10 −5 for Q 2 = 6.5 GeV 2 . The model [107] gives results for R Pb g at Q 2 = 2.25 GeV 2 very close to those of [99,103] at x = 0.01 -as it was the case for R F 2 , but sizably smaller, R Pb F 2 ≃ 0.37, at x = 10 −5 . Finally, [42] gives R Pb g ∼ 0.95 at x = 0.01 and ∼ 0.75 at x = 10 −4 for Q 2 = 4 GeV 2 .…”
Section: Comparison Among Different Modelssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations