2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab479b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Imprint of Spiral Arms on the Galactic Rotation Curve

Abstract: We discuss a model for the Milky Way obtained by fitting the observed terminal velocities with the radial acceleration relation. The resulting stellar surface density profile departs from a smooth exponential disk, having bumps and wiggles that correspond to massive spiral arms. These features are used to estimate the term for the logarithmic density gradient in the Jeans equation, which turn out to have exactly the right location and amplitude to reconcile the apparent discrepancy between the stellar rotation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(107 reference statements)
5
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearby, the rotation velocities are dominated by the known ridges in the (R, V * φ ) plane, which are now detected up to 14 kpc from the Galactic centre, that is 3 kpc farther than for DR2, while two additional ridges are discovered that reach 16-18 kpc. The overlap of distinct ridges in R seems to be the cause of some oscillation seen in the rotation curve, as already suggested by Martinez-Medina et al (2019), although they could also be related to the physical location of the spiral arms (Sancisi 2004;McGaugh 2019), rather than their resonances (Barros et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussion (I): Mw Disc Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Nearby, the rotation velocities are dominated by the known ridges in the (R, V * φ ) plane, which are now detected up to 14 kpc from the Galactic centre, that is 3 kpc farther than for DR2, while two additional ridges are discovered that reach 16-18 kpc. The overlap of distinct ridges in R seems to be the cause of some oscillation seen in the rotation curve, as already suggested by Martinez-Medina et al (2019), although they could also be related to the physical location of the spiral arms (Sancisi 2004;McGaugh 2019), rather than their resonances (Barros et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussion (I): Mw Disc Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The OC memberships mostly come from Cantat-Gaudin & Anders (2020), who used the unsupervised classification scheme UPMASK (Krone-Martins & Moitinho 2014;Cantat-Gaudin et al 2018). These authors also applied UPMASK to the recently discovered University of Barcelona clusters (UBC, Castro-Ginard et al 2018, 2019 and to the clusters discovered by Liu & Pang (2019). For the Hyades and Coma Berenices, they adopted the list of members published by Gaia Collaboration (2018a) because UPMASK cannot recover members for populated clusters that are too extended on the sky.…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large fraction of candidate OCs could not be confirmed by Gaia or was proved to correspond to chance alignment. The number of OC candidates has also significantly increased, either through serendipitous discoveries in Gaia DR2 (Cantat-Gaudin et al 2018;Ferreira et al 2019), or as the result of systematic searches (Castro-Ginard et al 2018, 2019Cantat-Gaudin et al 2019;Sim et al 2019;Liu & Pang 2019). An updated catalogue of membership probabilities for 1481 OCs has been provided by .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 In a recent paper [32] the same authors study the hypothesis of a condensate similar to the one of Bherezhiani/Khoury and formulate a model which, in its superfluid phase, leads ("in an idealized limit") to MOND-like dynamics again with the same interpolation function (73). They investigate whether such a model is consistent with empirical data from [38,44] on the rotation curve of the Milky Way. According to their analysis this is the case, if one allows a moderate rescaling of the baryonic mass by a factor f b = 0.8 which lies in the range of the observational uncertainty.…”
Section: A Short Look At Galactic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the sequel we find a preference for setting β = 6 (see (38)) and reasons for assuming γ = 4 (Result b) on p. 20). So we can put the Lagrangians…”
Section: Lagrange Densitymentioning
confidence: 90%