The Importance-Performance Analysis of the Quality of Services Provided for Patients in Hospitals Affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science

Abstract

Background: Quality is a key factor in the distinction of services, and it is a potential source of sustainable competitive advantage to increase productiveness and patient satisfaction. The identification of strengths and weaknesses in quality of provided services can help to recognize priorities and develop improvement strategies.
 Objectives: Using importance-performance analysis (IPA) method, this study aimed to evaluate the quality of services provided in hospitals affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
 Methods: Using stratified random sampling, this descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study included 307 patients admitted to five Educational Hospitals affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Data collection tool was a standard questionnaire proposed by Tomes & Chee Peng Ng (1995), which included demographic information and questions regarding the quality of services provided in seven factors. In addition to IPA, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson’s correlation, and chi squared test in SPSS software version 21.
 Results: Total scores of quality factors were estimated as “important” in our research. In quality performance, “food”, “physical environment” and “dignity” factors were estimated as “relatively inappropriate” by mean scores of 2.50 ± 0.95, 2.90 ± 0.97 and 2.94 ± 1.05, respectively. These three factors were located in the second region of the IPA matrix. While the other four factors, including “empathy”, “relationship of mutual respect”, “understanding of illness” and “religious needs,” with mean scores higher than 3 were estimated as “appropriate” and located in the first region of this matrix. In all quality factors, scores of performance were lower than importance, and the gap between importance and performance in these seven factors ranged from 0.82 to 1.52. There was a significant relationship between age and education of respondents with the quality of services.
 Conclusions: Given that the largest gap was related to the tangible dimensions of quality (including food and physical environment) and in order to improve the quality of services and competitive position, hospital managers must consider tangible dimension as a priority. Keywords: Quality of Services; Importance-Performance Analysis; Hospital; Hospital Services.

Understanding International Students’ Perspective of Health Service Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Hungarian University

“…This acknowledgment underscores the recognition that achieving ideal conditions is often a complex and multifaceted endeavor, subject to various real-world constraints and limitations. Although this study found a significant negative gap, compared to other studies in healthcare settings in several countries such as Brazil 11 and Iran, 10 , 13 , 19 the findings of this study are better. This indicates that the University Health Center offers a commendable service compared to international providers.…”

“… 11 Combining customer ratings from Performance and Importance provided an overall view of satisfaction and clear direction for management regarding where to focus their resources. 13 , 18 , 19 The IPA methodology involves the comparison of an ideal value with the existing reality, providing a mechanism for assessing the alignment or disparity between theoretical ideals and practical outcomes. The IPA method has several advantages, such as being easy to administer, efficient, and applicable to various fields.…”

“… 11 , 12 , 20 In the healthcare sector, the IPA method has been used to assess the quality of services from the patient’s point of view in primary healthcare, dental services, hospitals, and medical services. 9–11 , 13 , 19 , 21 , 22 …”

Importance-Performance Analysis of Clinical Forensic Services Quality at Bhayangkara Hospital Pekanbaru, Indonesia

“…The IPA matrix in the form of an IPA Cartesian diagram was divided into four quadrants, which were bounded by two axes that intersect perpendicularly at point ( x , y ), where the P means were the x -axis and the E means were on the y -axis. The items could then be analysed based on resource allocation priorities ( 8 , 12 , 18 ). The IPA matrix was created and analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (USA).…”

“…The IPA method is a reliable analytical tool for practitioners and academics, and it finds attributes that require corrective action. IPA allows hospital management and other health services to understand patient perceptions and expectations ( 8 , 11 , 12 ).…”