2016
DOI: 10.1177/1747016116656023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB

Abstract: Institutional review boards have a dual goal: first, to protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects, and second, to support and facilitate the conduct of valuable research. In striving to achieve these goals, IRBs must often consider conflicting interests. In the discussion below, we characterize research oversight as having three elements: (i) research regulations, which establish a minimum acceptable standard for research conduct; (ii) ethical principles, which help us identify and define relev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential threats to autonomy, voluntariness and participant welfare illustrated in our analysis have been documented in other empirical inquiries about incentives in health research more generally (Fisher, 2011) and with sex workers specifically (Anderson et al, 2016; Brown et al, 2015; Reed et al, 2014). Discussions of these harms have primarily emphasized a neoliberal, principle-based lens that stresses a focus on the individual and their rights that assumes equality among participants and researchers in the ability to exercise choice (Larkin et al, 2008; Morris & Morris, 2016; Resnik, 2012; Singer, 2011). Our application of relational autonomy as a critical theoretical lens (Mackenzie & Stoljar, 2000; Sherwin, 1992) required us to attend to a justice orientation that exposes inequities in research practices and processes that perpetuated marginalization, overrode opportunities for self-determination, and created the possibility for harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential threats to autonomy, voluntariness and participant welfare illustrated in our analysis have been documented in other empirical inquiries about incentives in health research more generally (Fisher, 2011) and with sex workers specifically (Anderson et al, 2016; Brown et al, 2015; Reed et al, 2014). Discussions of these harms have primarily emphasized a neoliberal, principle-based lens that stresses a focus on the individual and their rights that assumes equality among participants and researchers in the ability to exercise choice (Larkin et al, 2008; Morris & Morris, 2016; Resnik, 2012; Singer, 2011). Our application of relational autonomy as a critical theoretical lens (Mackenzie & Stoljar, 2000; Sherwin, 1992) required us to attend to a justice orientation that exposes inequities in research practices and processes that perpetuated marginalization, overrode opportunities for self-determination, and created the possibility for harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of this study support that an employee's ethical behavior is formed partially by the direct effects of cardinal virtues. Morris and Morris (2016), contend that Virtue ethics, focuses on the development of the character of the individual who must confront ethical dilemmas. Virtue ethics recognizes that making a decision about difficult problems depends on the character of the people making decisions.…”
Section: H2: Increased Temperance Positively Influences Employees' Cyber Security Ethical Behavioral Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final comment on Carpenter's paper is by Morris and Morris. They were invited to comment as a result of their article 'The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB' (Morris & Morris, 2016) in the journal Research Ethics. In that paper they are concerned with the review of biomedical research.…”
Section: Summary Of Chaptersmentioning
confidence: 99%