1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(98)93320-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The importance of surgery and accurate axillary staging for survival in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very plausible explanation for the finding in county C is that the quality of axillary surgery or the pathological examinations of the lymph nodes improved from the first to the last period since the number of patients with more than 15 nodes examined increased from 33 to 66%. Increasing the number of examined lymph nodes from axillary dissections have been found to increase the degree of nodal involvement and this is a likely explanation for the finding in county C [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A very plausible explanation for the finding in county C is that the quality of axillary surgery or the pathological examinations of the lymph nodes improved from the first to the last period since the number of patients with more than 15 nodes examined increased from 33 to 66%. Increasing the number of examined lymph nodes from axillary dissections have been found to increase the degree of nodal involvement and this is a likely explanation for the finding in county C [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…During the years preceding the DBCG approval of the SNLB study several reports [10,11] demonstrated better survival after treatment in centers specialized in breast cancer surgery. Recommendations had advocated that breast cancer surgery should be centralized in departments with more than 150 operations per year, and that operations should be performed by surgeons dedicated to and specialized in breast cancer treatment [12Á14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DBCG register has in previous studies been considered a population-based register with a completeness rate of 90 Á/ 95% of all incident cases in patients younger than age 70 years (6,7). A recent study linking the Danish National Cancer Registry and the DBCG register concluded that the DBCG can not replace the National Cancer Registry as a reliable source for incident breast cancer cases, as 18% were missing in the DBCG register (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%