The importance of social media to the academic surgical literature: Relationship between Twitter activity and readership metrics

Abstract

Background: Social media has an increasing role within professional surgical practice, including the publishing and engagement of academic literature. This study aims to analyze the relationship between social media use and traditional and alternative metrics among academic surgical journals. Method: Journals were identified through the InCites Journal Citation Reports 2019, and their impact factor, h-index, and CiteScore were noted. Social media platforms were examined, and Twitter activity interrogated between 1 January to 31 December 2019. Healthcare Social Graph score and an aggregated Altmetric Attention Score were also calculated for each journal. Statistical analysis was carried out to look at the correlation between traditional metrics, Twitter activity, and altmetrics. Results: Journals with a higher impact factor were more likely to use a greater number of social media platforms (R 2 ¼ 0.648; P < .0001). Journals with dedicated Twitter profiles had a higher impact factor than journals without (median, 2.96 vs 1.88; Mann-Whitney U ¼ 390; P < .001); however, over a 1-year period (2018e2019) having a Twitter presence did not alter impact factor (Mann-Whitney U ¼ 744.5; P ¼ .885). Increased Twitter activity was positively correlated with impact factor. Longitudinal analysis over 6 years suggested cumulative tweets correlated with an increased impact factor (R 2 ¼ 0.324, P ¼ .004). Novel alternative measures including Healthcare Social Graph score (R 2 ¼ 0.472, P ¼ .005) and Altmetric Attention Score (R 2 ¼ 0.779, P ¼ .001) positively correlated with impact factor. Conclusion: Higher impact factor is associated with social media presence and activity, particularly on Twitter, with long-term activity being of particular importance. Modern alternative metrics correlate with impact factor. This relationship is complex, and future studies should look to understand this further.

Impact of #PsychTwitter in promoting global psychiatry: A hashtag analysis study

“…Finally, the 52 weekly rankings and quality scores are combined into a single number for each social media profile and then normalized on a scale of 0 to 100. This final number is known as the Healthcare Social Graph Score (18,19).…”

The applications of eHealth technologies in the management of asthma and allergic diseases

“… 35 Randomized studies have shown that posting on social media about a specific scientific article can increase its metric statistics, such as the number of readers 36 and citations 37 and impact factor. 38 …”

“…35 Randomized studies have shown that posting on social media about a specific scientific article can increase its metric statistics, such as the number of readers 36 and citations 37 and impact factor. 38 With more than one billion monthly users, YouTube is the second largest search engine, after the flagship service provided by its parent company, Alphabet/Google. However, what patients find on YouTube can be misleading and it was only occasionally correct.…”

“…A blogging platform gives more control to the author in terms of website design, structure and web address versus social media posts 35 . Randomized studies have shown that posting on social media about a specific scientific article can increase its metric statistics, such as the number of readers 36 and citations 37 and impact factor 38 …”

Differentiating What is hot from what is scientifically sound

“…The current edition of Surgery contains an article by Mobarak et al 1 titled "The Importance of Social Media to the Academic Surgical Literature: Relationship Between Twitter Activity and Readership Metrics." It describes how journals with higher impact factors have a greater social media presence and activity levels.…”