The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services

Robards, Martin D.; Schoon, Michael; Meek, Chanda L.; Engle, Nathan L.

doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.004

Cited by 128 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Specified resilience concerns resilience of what to what and also for whom , Robards et al 2011, Brown 2014. General resilience is for the unknown and the unknowable (Kates and Clark 1996, Peterson et al 2003a, Polasky et al 2011a, for having the capacity to deal with complexity, uncertainty, and surprise (Walker et al 2009a, Carpenter et al 2012a.…”

Section: What Is Resilience?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…But resilience is influencing the environmental sciences from agriculture to oceans as well as global environmental and climate change reflected in, e.g., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports (e.g., O'Brien et al 2012) and in risk and disaster management (e.g., Berkes 2007, Tidball et al 2010, McSweeney and Coomes 2011, Djalante et al 2013). Resilience thinking is raised in the development literature and in diverse ontologies and epistemologies of the social sciences and the humanities (e.g., Hamel and Välikangas 2003, Redman 2005, Hegmon et al 2008, Simmie and Martin 2010, Robards et al 2011, Crépin et al 2012, Plieninger and Bieling 2012, Ebbesson and Hey 2013, Hall and Lamont 2013, Lorenz 2013, Lyon and Parkins 2013, Barrett and Constas 2014, Chandler 2014, Tidball 2014, Bourbeau 2015, Hobman and Walker 2015, Marston 2015, Sjöstedt 2015, Weichselgartner and Kelman 2015 and with diverse reactions from excitement to those that oppose the approach for diverse reasons (reviewed by, e.g., Brown 2014, Cretney 2014, Stone-Jovicich 2015.…”

Section: Early Work On Resilience and The Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rather, they were incorporated as part of analyses of complex adaptive socialecological systems, reflected in the abundant resilience work on agency, actors, participation, diverse knowledge systems, learning, coproduction, adaptive management, social networks, collective action, institutions, stewardship, social-ecological innovation, transformation, and multilevel and adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Issues of inequality and diverse aspects of power and politics in social-ecological systems and sustainability are explicitly addressed through collaboration across knowledge domains and in the continuous evolution of resilience thinking (e.g., Lebel et al 2006, Crona and Bodin 2010, Raudsepp-Herne et al 2010a, Smith and Stirling 2010, Michon 2011, Robards et al 2011, Enfors 2013, Fischer et al 2015, StoneJovicich 2015, Boonstra 2016. In this context, Brown (2016) argues that resilience can help understand and respond to the challenges of the contemporary age, challenges characterized by high uncertainty, globalized and interconnected systems, increasing disparities, and limited choices.…”

Section: Resilience Of People or Planet In Development?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They enter resilience thinking as significant features of understanding and governing social-ecological dynamics for biosphere stewardship, human well-being, and sustainability (e.g., Lebel et al 2006, Robards et al 2011, Fischer et al 2015.…”

Section: Capturing Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Resilience (Republished)

Folke¹

2016

E&S

635

393

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT.Resilience thinking in relation to the environment has emerged as a lens of inquiry that serves a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue and collaboration. Resilience is about cultivating the capacity to sustain development in the face of expected and surprising change and diverse pathways of development and potential thresholds between them. The evolution of resilience thinking is coupled to socialecological systems and a truly intertwined human-environment planet. Resilience as persistence, adaptability, and transformability of complex adaptive social-ecological systems is the focus, clarifying the dynamic and forward-looking nature of the concept. Resilience thinking emphasizes that social-ecological systems, from the individual, to community, to society as a whole, are embedded in the biosphere. The biosphere connection is an essential observation if sustainability is to be taken seriously. In the continuous advancement of resilience thinking there are efforts aimed at capturing resilience of social-ecological systems and finding ways for people and institutions to govern social-ecological dynamics for improved human well-being, at the local, across levels and scales, to the global. Consequently, in resilience thinking, development issues for human well-being, for people and planet, are framed in a context of understanding and governing complex social-ecological dynamics for sustainability as part of a dynamic biosphere.This invited article is a republication of Folke, C. 2016. "Resilience" of the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science

show abstract

Section: What Is Resilience?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Early Work On Resilience and The Environmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resilience Of People or Planet In Development?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Capturing Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Resilience (Republished)

Folke¹

2016

E&S

635

393

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Investigating the spatial distribution of the benefits and the contribution to that revenue by different groups was not part of the scope of our study. Future studies that evaluate these issues at Lafken Mapu Lahaul or elsewhere can provide insight into how the distribution of financial contributions, costs and benefits of an MPA may affect longer term social and conservation outcomes (Walpole and Goodwin 2000;Robards et al 2011).…”

Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Financing Marine Protected Areas Through Visitor Fees: Insights from Tourists Willingness to Pay in Chile

Gelcich

Amar

Valdebenito

et al. 2013

AMBIO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tourism is a financing mechanism considered by many donor-funded marine conservation initiatives. Here we assess the potential role of visitor entry fees, in generating the necessary revenue to manage a marine protected area (MPA), established through a Global Environmental Facility Grant, in a temperate region of Chile. We assess tourists' willingness to pay (WTP) for an entry fee associated to management and protection of the MPA. Results show 97 % of respondents were willing to pay an entrance fee. WTP predictors included the type of tourist, tourists' sensitivity to crowding, education, and understanding of ecological benefits of the MPA. Nature-based tourists state median WTP values of US$ 4.38 and Sun-seasand tourists US$ 3.77. Overall, entry fees could account for 10-13 % of MPA running costs. In Chile, where funding for conservation runs among the weakest in the world, visitor entry fees are no panacea in the short term and other mechanisms, including direct state/government support, should be considered.

show abstract

Linking Ocean's Benefits to People (OBP) with Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (IEAs)

Belgrano

Villasante

2020

Population Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The fundamental challenge of the inclusion of the human dimension of the oceans in the Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (IEAs) provides an opportunity for a transdisciplinary approach to create synergies between the current research by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We have highlighted the importance of ocean inequality as a critical aspect to consider to unlock current barriers to integrate social sciences in marine integrated assessments. To create bridges between them, we develop an Ocean's Benefits to People (OBP) framework that embraces the blue economy, equity, the UN SDGs goals and support an Ecosystem‐Based Management (EBM) for the oceans.

show abstract

The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services

Cited by 128 publications

References 66 publications

Resilience (Republished)

Resilience (Republished)

Financing Marine Protected Areas Through Visitor Fees: Insights from Tourists Willingness to Pay in Chile

Linking Ocean's Benefits to People (OBP) with Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (IEAs)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About